M/S Chipsan Aviation PVT. LTD. vs. Commissioner Of Central GST,Delhisouth Commissionerate And Others

W.P.(C)/1443/2025HC DelhiGSTCNR DLHC01005048202504 March 2025Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHWANT VARMA,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR2 pages
For Petitioner: Mr. K. N. Jayasankar, Mr. T.T. Biju and Mr. Dassa P.A., AdvsFor Respondent: Mr. Aditya Singla, SSC, CBIC with Mr. Ritvik Saha, Adv. for R-1 to 4. Ms. Vaishali Gupta, Panel Counsel (Civil) for R-3/ GNCTD. Mr. Niraj Kumar, Sr. Central Govt. Counsel for R-5/UOI
AI SummaryDismissed

Facts

The petitioner, M/s Chipsan Aviation Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition before the Delhi High Court challenging a final order passed by the Commissioner of Central GST, Delhi South Commissionerate. The case concerns an inter-state supply of services. The petitioner contended that the CGST authority lacked jurisdiction. The court noted that the classification of services is an issue that can be addressed by the petitioner in appropriate statutory proceedings. The writ petition was filed in 2025.

Held

The Court held that the submission that the CGST authority had no jurisdiction is unsustainable, given that the case undisputedly involves an inter-state supply of services. Regarding the classification of services, the Court found that this is an issue that can always be addressed by the petitioner in appropriate statutory proceedings. Therefore, the Court dismissed the writ petition, while explicitly reserving liberty to the petitioner to pursue the matter through statutory remedies. No specific amount in dispute was recorded, nor were specific tax periods mentioned.

Key Issues

1. Whether the CGST authority had jurisdiction to pass an order concerning an inter-state supply of services, as contended by the petitioner? 2. Whether the classification of services is an issue that can be raised in a writ petition or must be pursued through statutory proceedings, as argued by the respondents? The petitioner argued that the CGST authority lacked jurisdiction. The respondents, including the Commissioner of Central GST and the Union of India, contended that the case involved an inter-state supply of services, making the CGST authority's jurisdiction valid. They also argued that the issue of classification of services is a matter that should be addressed through appropriate statutory proceedings rather than a writ petition.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1443/2025 & CM APPL. 7016/2025 (Stay) M/S CHIPSAN AVIATION PVT. LTD. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. K. N. Jayasankar, Mr. T.T. Biju and Mr. Dassa P.A., Advs. versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL GST, DELHI SOUTH COMMISSIONERATE AND OTHERS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Aditya Singla, SSC, CBIC with Mr. Ritvik Saha, Adv. for R-1 to 4. Ms. Vaishali Gupta, Panel Counsel (Civil) for R-3/ GNCTD. Mr. Niraj Kumar, Sr. Central Govt. Counsel for R-5/UOI. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHWANT VARMA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR

O R D E R %

04.03.

2025

1.

We find no justification to entertain this writ petition which is directed against a final order passed by the Central Goods and Services Tax [„CGST‟] authority.

2.

Undisputedly, the case involves an inter-state supply of services and, therefore, the submission that the CGST authority had no juri iction, is clearly unsustainable.

3.

Insofar as the issue of classification of services is concerned, that is one which can always be addressed by the petitioner in This is a digitally sig

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Delhi High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.