Food Safety And Standards Authority Of INDIA vs. Additional Commissioner, CGST, Delhi North & Ors.
Original PDF →Facts
The Petitioner, Food Safety and Standards Authority of India, filed a writ petition before the Delhi High Court challenging an order passed by the Additional Commissioner, CGST, Delhi North. The specific tax period and the amount in dispute are not recorded in the judgment. The procedural history leading to the writ petition is also not detailed. The matter was listed for hearing before a division bench of the High Court.
Held
The Court granted the Petitioner's request to withdraw the writ petition. The Petitioner was granted a period of 30 days from the date of the order to file an appeal challenging the impugned order. The Court further directed that if the appeal is filed within this 30-day period, along with the requisite pre-deposit, it shall be considered on its merits and shall not be dismissed on the ground of limitation. The writ petition was accordingly dismissed as withdrawn with this liberty granted. All pending applications, if any, were also disposed of. The Court did not decide any substantive issues related to GST law or the merits of the impugned order, as the petition was withdrawn.
Key Issues
1. Whether the Petitioner is entitled to withdraw the present writ petition to file an appeal challenging the impugned order? (Question of procedure) The Petitioner, through its counsel, argued that it wished to withdraw the present petition and file an appeal against the impugned order. The Petitioner sought a period of 30 days to file this appeal, along with the requisite pre-deposit. The Petitioner requested that if the appeal is filed within the stipulated period, it should be considered on its merits and not dismissed solely on the grounds of limitation. The Respondent(s), Additional Commissioner, CGST, Delhi North & Ors., were noted as having no appearance, and therefore, no arguments were recorded on their behalf.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
O R D E R % 05.05.2025
This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.
After some hearing, Mr. Kamal Sawhney, ld. Counsel for the Petitioner submits that he wishes to withdraw the present petition and file an appeal challenging the impugned order. A period of 30 days is being granted to file the same along with the requisite pre-deposit. If the same is filed within the stipulated period, the appeal shall be considered on merits and shall not be dismissed on the ground of limitation.
Accordingly, petition is dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. All pending applications, if any, are also disposed of. PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J. RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J. MAY 5, 2025/Rahul/Ar. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 22:16:32
Reproduced from the public record of the Delhi High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.