Rohit Gupta And Ors. vs. Mr. Pramod Kumar, Commissioner Of CGST, Delhi West

Original PDF →
CONT.CAS(C)/90/2024HC DelhiGSTCNR DLHC01001371202406 May 2025Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL2 pages
For Petitioner: Mr. Vineet Bhatia, AdvocateFor Respondent: Mr. Aditya Singla, SSC and Mr. Ritwik Saha, Advocates 32
AI SummaryPartly Allowed

Facts

These are two contempt petitions, CONT.CAS(C) 90/2024 and CONT.CAS(C) 91/2024, filed before the Delhi High Court. The petitioners, Rohit Gupta and others, and Bhagwan Gupta and others respectively, are represented by Mr. Vineet Bhatia, Advocate. The respondent is Mr. Pramod Kumar, Commissioner of CGST, Delhi West, represented by Mr. Aditya Singla, SSC, and Mr. Ritwik Saha, Advocates. The petitions were listed for hearing on May 6, 2025. The counsel for the petitioners informed the Court that the amounts sought under these petitions have been released to them.

Held

The Court granted the petitioners leave to withdraw their contempt petitions. The Court also granted the petitioners liberty to seek their remedies in accordance with law, specifically noting their right to seek interest on account of the delayed refund. The reasoning for granting the withdrawal was based on the petitioner's submission that the amounts in dispute had been released. The Court disposed of both petitions. No specific provisions of the CGST Act or Rules were discussed in relation to the withdrawal or the liberty granted.

Key Issues

1. Whether the petitioners are entitled to withdraw their contempt petitions given that the amounts sought have been released? 2. Whether the petitioners are at liberty to seek interest on account of the delayed refund? The petitioners' counsel stated that the amounts sought under the petitions have been released and therefore sought leave to withdraw the petitions, with liberty to seek interest on account of delayed refund. The respondent's counsel did not record any specific arguments.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
$~31& 32 * IN THEHIGH COURTOF DELHIAT NEW DELHI + CONT.CAS(C) 90/2024 ROHIT GUPTA AND ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Vineet Bhatia, Advocate versus MR. PRAMOD KUMAR, COMMISSIONER OF CGST, DELHI WEST .....Respondent Through: Mr. Aditya Singla, SSC and Mr. Ritwik Saha, Advocates 32 + CONT.CAS(C) 91/2024 BHAGWAN GUPTA AND ORS. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vineet Bhatia, Advocate versus MR. PRAMOD KUMAR, COMMISSIONER OF CGST, DELHI WEST .....Respondent Through: Mr. Aditya Singla, SSC and Mr. Ritwik Saha, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL

O R D E R %

06.05.

2025

1.

Counsel for petitioners, who appears through VC, states that the amounts sought under these petitions have been released to them and he therefore, seeks leave to withdraw these petitions, with liberty to seek interest on account of delayed refund.

2.

Leave and liberty granted. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 01:35:28

3.

Both these petitions stand disposed of.

4.

Petitioners are at liberty to seek their remedies in accordance with law.

5.

Order be uploaded on the website of this Court. ANISH DAYAL, J MAY 6, 2025/sm/na This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 01:35:28

Reproduced from the public record of the Delhi High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.