M/S. Amazon Data Services INDIA Private Limited vs. Joint Commissioner Of CGST, Division Nehru Place, Delhi East Commissionerate

Original PDF →
W.P.(C)/7196/2025HC DelhiGSTCNR DLHC01033224202529 May 2025Bench: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA7 pages
For Petitioner: Mr. Balbir Singh, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Charanaya Lakshmi Kumaran, Mr. Yogendra Aldak, Mr. Karan Sachdev, Mr. Agrim Arora, Mr. Kunal Arora, Mr. Kunal Kapoor, Mr. Yatharth Tripathi & Ms. Charu Trivedi, AdvsFor Respondent: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Chaddha, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Hemant Kumar, Adv. 5 WITH
AI SummaryRemanded

Facts

M/s. Amazon Data Services India Private Limited (Petitioner) filed multiple writ petitions challenging four impugned orders-in-appeal passed by the Appellate Authority. These orders pertained to refund proceedings for various periods between August 2019 and March 2022. The core of the dispute revolved around whether the services provided by the Petitioner constituted exports under GST law. The Petitioner highlighted that the Appellate Authority itself had previously passed orders in their favour on identical issues, dated December 31, 2024, and January 1, 2025, which had attained finality as they were not challenged by the Respondent-Department. Additionally, certain Orders-in-Original by the Adjudicating Authority, also favouring the Petitioner, had not been appealed.

Held

The Court held that the impugned orders-in-appeal, which were passed prior to the Appellate Authority's subsequent orders dated December 31, 2024, and January 1, 2025, needed reconsideration. The Court noted that these subsequent orders, along with Circular No. 232/26/2024-GST dated September 10, 2024, were crucial for a proper adjudication of the Petitioner's claim. The reasoning was that the Appellate Authority had already ruled in favour of the Petitioner on identical issues in later orders that had attained finality. Therefore, the Court set aside the impugned orders-in-appeal and remanded the matters back to the Commissioner (Appeals) for a fresh adjudication. The Appellate Authority was directed to reconsider the cases in light of the aforementioned subsequent orders and the circular, ensuring an opportunity for a personal hearing to the Petitioner. The adjudication was to be completed within four months.

Key Issues

1. Whether the services rendered by the Petitioner constitute exports under the Goods and Services Tax (GST) law, specifically in light of Circular No. 232/26/2024-GST dated September 10, 2024. (Question of law) Petitioner's arguments: The Petitioner contended that the services provided by them, specifically hosting data services, should be classified as exports. They relied on Circular No. 232/26/2024-GST, which they argued clarifies that such supplies constitute exports. Furthermore, they pointed to prior orders passed by the Appellate Authority itself (dated December 31, 2024, and January 1, 2025) and Orders-in-Original from the Adjudicating Authority, which had already held similar services as exports and had not been challenged by the Revenue, thus attaining finality. Revenue's arguments: The Revenue, through its counsel, confirmed that the favourable orders passed by the Appellate Authority in favour of the Petitioner had not been challenged and had attained finality. No other specific arguments were recorded for the Revenue.

Sections Cited

Section 73, Section 129

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Heard together (3 matters)

W.P.(C) 7191/2025
W.P.(C) 7196/2025
W.P.(C) 7235/2025

Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
W.P.(C) 7191/2025 & connected matters Page 1 of 7 $~4 to 7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7191/2025 M/S. AMAZON DATA SERVICES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Balbir Singh, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Charanaya Lakshmi Kumaran, Mr. Yogendra Aldak, Mr. Karan Sachdev, Mr. Agrim Arora, Mr. Kunal Arora, Mr. Kunal Kapoor, Mr. Yatharth Tripathi & Ms. Charu Trivedi, Advs. versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF CGST, DIVISION NEHRU PLACE, DELHI EAST COMMISSIONERATE ....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Chaddha, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Hemant Kumar, Adv. 5 WITH + W.P.(C) 7196/2025 M/S. AMAZON DATA SERVICES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Balbir Singh, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Charanaya Lakshmi Kumaran, Mr. Yogendra Aldak, Mr. Karan Sachdev, Mr. Agrim Arora, Mr. Kunal Arora, Mr. Kunal Kapoor, Mr. Yatharth Tripathi & Ms. Charu Trivedi, Advs. versus JOINT COMMISSIONER OF CGST, DIVISION NEHRU PLACE, DELHI EAST COMMISSIONERATE ...Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Chaddha, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Hemant Kumar, Adv. 6 WITH + W.P.(C) 7235/2025 M/S. AMAZON DATA SERVICES INDIA PRIVATE

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 22:20:18 LIMITED

.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Balbir Singh, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Charanaya Lakshmi Kumaran, Mr. Yogendra Aldak, Mr. Karan Sachdev, Mr. Agrim Arora, Mr. Kunal Arora, Mr. Kunal Kapoor, Mr. Yatharth Tripathi & Ms. Charu Trivedi, Advs.

versus

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF CGST, DIVISION NEHRU PLACE, DELHI EAST COMMISSIONERATE ...Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Chaddha, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Hemant Kumar, Adv. 7

AND +

W.P.(C) 7281/2025

M/S. AMAZON DATA SERVICES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED

.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Balbir Singh, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Charanaya Lakshmi Kumaran, Mr. Yogendra Aldak, Mr. Karan Sachdev, Mr. Agrim Arora, Mr. Kunal Arora, Mr. Kunal Kapoor, Mr. Yatharth Tripathi & Ms. Charu Trivedi, Advs.

versus

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF CGST, DIVISION NEHRU PLACE, DELHI EAST COMMISSIONERATE .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Chaddha, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Hemant Kumar, Adv.

CORAM:

JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH

JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA

O R D E R %

29.05.

2025 This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 22:20:18 1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

2.

The Petitioner in the present writ petitions– M/s Amazon Data Services India Private Limited has filed these petitions primarily challenging the four impugned orders-in-appeal (hereinafter, ‘the impugned orders’). The details of the periods giving rise to the said proceedings, the relevant show cause notices, the consequent Orders-in-Original and the subsequent impugned orders passed by the Appellate Authority are set out in the chart below: SUMMARY OF REFUND PROCEEDINGS

S. No Period SCN date Order in original Order passed by Appellate Authority I. Writ Petition No. 7235/2025 (Aug 2019 to March 2020) [Item 69]

1.

August, 2019 31.10. 2020 05.03.2021 (@ Annexure P2,

31.08.

2022 (@ Annexure P1, Writ Petition No. 7235/2025)

2.

Sept, 2019 31.10. 2020 05.03.2021 (@ Annexure P3,

3.

Oct- Dec’19 06.05. 2021 30.05.2021 (@ Annexure P4,

4.

Jan- Mar’20 06.05. 2021 30.05.2021 (@ Annexure P5,

5.

Apr- June’20

06.05.

2021 05.03.2021 (@ Annexure P6,

6.

July- Sept’20 17.05. 2021 04.06.2021 (@ Annexure P7, II. Writ Petition No. 7281/2025 (Oct 2020 to March 2021) [Item 81]

7.

Oct- Dec’20 06.09. 2021 30.11.2022 (@ Annexure P2,

29.01.

2024 (@ Annexure P1, Writ Petition No. 7281/2025)

8.

Jan- March’ 21 06.09. 2021 02.12.2022 (@ Annexure P3, III. Writ Petition No. 7196/2025 (Apr 2021 to Sept 2021) [Item 54]

9.

April - Sept’21 11.04. 2023 04.05.2023 (@ Annexure P2,

15.02.

2024 (@ Annexure P1, Writ This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 22:20:18 Petition No. 7196/2025) IV. Writ Petition No. 7191/2025 (Oct 2021 to March 2022) [Item 51]

10.

October 2021- March 2022 04.07. 2023 28.07.2023 (Annexure P2,

25.07.

2024 (Annexure P1, Writ Petition No. 7191/2025)

3.

The short question that arises for consideration in these petitions is whether the services being rendered by the Petitioner would constitute exports or not.

4.

In this regard, Mr. Balbir Singh, ld. Senior Counsel for Petitioner, on the last date of hearing had taken the Court through the Circular No. 232/26/2024-GST dated 10th September, 2024 wherein it is stated to have been clarified that supply of hosting data services provided by service providers located in India would constitute exports.

5.

On the last date of hearing i.e., 26th May, 2025, notice was issued to the Respondent-Department in these matters and the ld. Counsel was requested to seek instructions.

6.

Today, submissions have been heard on behalf of the parties. There is no doubt that there are various orders which have already been passed by the Appellate Authority itself, in favour of the Petitioner, holding identical services as constituting exports.

7.

Mr. Chaddha, ld. Counsel confirms that these orders have not been challenged by the Respondent-Department and have thus attained finality. The said orders are attached with the present petitions and are dated 31st December, 2024 and 1st January, 2025. 8. It is further submitted on behalf of the Petitioners that certain Orders- This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 22:20:18 in-Original have also been passed by the Adjudicating Authority in favour of the Petitioner, dated 11th March, 2024 and 16th April, 2024, holding identical services to be constituting exports. These orders have also not been challenged in appeal and shall thus be considered while deciding the present petitions.

9.

The details of the respective appeals leading to the Orders-in-Appeal dated 31st December, 2024 and 1st January, 2025are as under:

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 22:20:18 10. Mr. Singh, ld. Senior Counsel submits that in terms of these orders, refunds have also been issued to the Petitioner.

11.

Considering this position, it is deemed appropriate that instead of entertaining the challenge in these writ petitions, the Appellate Authority shall reconsider the impugned orders once again in light of the Appellate Authority’s order dated 31st December, 2024 and 1st January, 2025 as also the Circular No. 232/26/2024-GST dated 10th September, 2024. Clearly, the impugned orders which are challenged before this Court were passed prior to the Orders-in-Appeal dated 31st December, 2024 and 1st January, 2025 which are relied upon by the Petitioners.

12.

Therefore, the impugned Orders-in-Appeal are set aside. The matters are remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for reconsideration. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 22:20:18 13. The said appeals shall be adjudicated within a period of four months after giving an opportunity of personal hearing to the Appellants.

14.

The petitions are allowed in the above terms and the same are disposed of. All pending applications, if any, are also disposed of.

PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J.

RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J. MAY 29, 2025 Rahul/ss This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 22:20:18

Reproduced from the public record of the Delhi High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.