Vertical Vyapar PVT LTD vs. Commissioner Of CGST, Delhi East
Original PDF →Facts
The Petitioner, Vertical Vyapar Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging an order dated January 25, 2025, passed by the Commissioner of CGST, Delhi East. The sole ground for challenge was the alleged non-issuance of a Show Cause Notice (SCN) and the absence of a personal hearing. The Petitioner claimed no SCN was issued and no personal hearing was provided. The Respondent, Commissioner of CGST, Delhi East, submitted that proper hearing notices were issued and personal hearings were granted on multiple dates. The impugned order itself contained extracts indicating that a Chartered Accountant attended a personal hearing on behalf of the Petitioner and others on October 27, 2022, and requested time for submissions. Further personal hearings were scheduled for October 30, 2022, November 17, 2022, and January 10, 2024, with a representative appearing for another entity on the last date. The Court noted that a Director of the Petitioner's associated entity was present during one of the hearings.
Held
The Court held that the Petitioner's claim of not receiving a Show Cause Notice (SCN) and not being provided a personal hearing was baseless. The Court examined the impugned order and found that it clearly indicated that proper hearing notices had been issued to the Petitioner. Specifically, the order mentioned that a Chartered Accountant attended a personal hearing on behalf of the Petitioner and other entities on October 27, 2022, and requested time for submissions. Furthermore, the order detailed subsequent scheduled personal hearings on October 30, 2022, November 17, 2022, and January 10, 2024. The Court also noted the presence of a Director of an associated entity during one of these hearings, which suggested that the Petitioner was indeed aware of the proceedings. Based on this evidence, the Court concluded that the Petitioner had sufficient notice and opportunity for a hearing. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed with costs.
Key Issues
1. Whether the Petitioner, Vertical Vyapar Pvt. Ltd., was denied a proper opportunity for a personal hearing as required by law, thereby violating principles of natural justice, in relation to the order dated January 25, 2025, passed by the Commissioner of CGST, Delhi East? The Petitioner argued that no Show Cause Notice (SCN) was issued and no personal hearing was provided, rendering the impugned order invalid. The Petitioner contended that the absence of these procedural safeguards violated their right to be heard. The Respondent argued that the Petitioner had sufficient notice and opportunities for personal hearings. They relied on extracts from the impugned order which indicated that a Chartered Accountant attended a personal hearing on behalf of the Petitioner and others on October 27, 2022, and that further hearings were scheduled. The Respondent also pointed out that a Director of an associated entity was present during one of these hearings, implying the Petitioner was aware of the proceedings.
Sections Cited
Article 226
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
O R D E R % 30.05.2025
This hearing has been done through hybrid mode. CM APPL. 35684/2025 (for exemption)
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. W.P.(C) 8167/2025
The present writ petition filed by the Petitioner – Vertical Vyapar Pvt. Ltd. under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenges the impugned order dated 25th January, 2025. The only ground on which the order is being assailed is that no Show Cause Notice (hereinafter ‘SCN’) was issued and no personal hearing was provided to the Petitioner. The affidavit has been filed in this matter by one Sh. Chandar Bhan.
A perusal of the impugned order would reveal that proper hearing notice has been issued to the Petitioner. The relevant extracts of the said This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 22:20:40
impugned order reads as under:
“26. 1. Shri Sahil Aggarwal, CA attended the personal hearing on 27.10.2022 on behalf of M/s Rajdarbar Commodities Pvt. Ltd., Shri Vasudev Garg, Director of M/s Rajdarbar Commodities Pvt. Ltd., M/s N S Software and M/s Vertical Vyapar Pvt. Ltd. He requested for two week time for submission and personal hearing in the matter.
Further, personal hearing in the matter was again granted to all the Noticees on 30.10.2022, 17.1 1.2022 but none of the Noticees availed the same.
Further, due to change of Adjudicating Authority, Personal hearing in the case was again granted to all the Noticees forJA10.2024. None of the Noticees but M/s Rajdarbar Commodities Pvt. Ltd. appeared for personal hearing on the said date and further no communication was received from them in this regard.
Shri Prince Bansal, Chartered Accountant appeared for personal hearing on 24.10.2024 on behalf of M/s Rajdarbar Commodities Pvt. Ltd. He submitted copy of written submissions dated 24.10.2024 and reiterated the arguments made in their written replies to the show cause notice and further requested for early conclusion in the matter.”
The above paragraph clearly shows that the Petitioner in this case i.e., M/s Vertical Vyapar Pvt. Ltd. had sufficient notice in this matter as Mr. Vasudev Garg was personally present. The writ petition alleging lack of notice is thus baseless. In view thereof, this writ, in the opinion of this Court, deserves to be dismissed with cost of Rs. 25,000/- to the Delhi High Court Bar Association in the following bank account: Name - Delhi High Court Bar Association A/c. No. - 15530100000478 IFSC Code - UCBA0001553 Bank & Branch - UCO Bank, Delhi High Court This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 22:20:40
The costs shall be paid within two weeks.
The Petition is dismissed in the above terms. Pending applications, if any, are also disposed of. PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J. RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J. MAY 30, 2025/da/Ar. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 22:20:40
Reproduced from the public record of the Delhi High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.