M/S Takeda Biopharmaceuticals INDIA Private Limited vs. The Joint Commissioner, CGST Appeals-Ii, Delhi & Ors.
Held
The High Court noted that the GSTAT is now functional and provides a statutory remedy. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of, allowing the petitioner to file an appeal before the GSTAT.
Facts
The petitioner's application for a GST refund was rejected, and their subsequent appeal was also dismissed. The writ petition was filed when the GST Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) was not functional.
Key Issues
Whether the writ petition is maintainable when a statutory appellate remedy is available. The availability of the GSTAT as a functional forum for appeal.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
O R D E R % 15.09.2026
The present Writ Petition was filed when the Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (‘GSTAT’) was not functional.
A perusal of the record reflects that the Petitioner’s application for refund of Rs.22,76,66,272/- was rejected. The appeal preferred by the Petitioner against the said order was also dismissed.
The GSTAT has since become functional and the Petitioner now has the statutory remedy of filing an appeal against the aforesaid appellate order.
Keeping in view the aforesaid position, the present Writ Petition is disposed of, while granting liberty to the Petitioner to file appeal This is a digitally signed order. The authentic
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Delhi High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.