Central Excise,Customs And Service Tax vs. M/S.A.K.Das Associates LTD.
Held
The High Court held that appeals concerning the rate of duty or exemption notifications are to be filed directly before the Supreme Court. Therefore, the present appeals before the High Court were not maintainable.
Facts
The Appellant Department appealed a CESTAT order that granted the Respondent Assessee exemption from service tax based on a notification. The Assessee contended that the appeal was not maintainable before the High Court.
Key Issues
Whether an appeal concerning exemption from service tax under a notification is maintainable before the High Court or must be filed directly before the Supreme Court.
Sections Cited
Section 35L, Section 11-C, Section 83
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
2022
Dr. S. Muralidhar, CJ.
A preliminary objection has been raised by the Respondent- Assessee to the maintainability of the present appeal relying on the judgment of the Supreme Court of India in Navin Chemicals Mfg. and Trading Co. Ltd. v. Colle
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Orissa High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.