M/S Lakshmi Narayana Food Products vs. The Assistant Commissioner
Held
The Court allowed the writ petition. Following its previous order in W.P.No.45971 of 2018, the Court set aside the assessment order passed by the 1st respondent. The assessment order had levied GST on the value of by-products, namely broken rice, bran, and husk, by treating them as part of the consideration paid to the petitioner for custom milling of paddy. The Court clarified that the petitioner would still be liable to pay tax on the sale of these by-products if they are statutorily taxable. The ratio decidendi is that by-products of custom milling, such as broken rice, bran, and husk, are not to be treated as part of the consideration for the milling service unless they are statutorily taxable. The operative direction was to set aside the assessment order.
Facts
The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging an assessment order passed by the 1st respondent, which levied GST on the value of broken rice, bran, and husk. These by-products were obtained by the petitioner from the custom milling of paddy. The petitioner argued that the issue was covered by a previous order of the High Court in W.P.No.45971 of 2018, dated 20.11.2020. The learned Government Pleader for Commercial Tax, representing the respondents, did not dispute this fact. The 1st respondent is the authority that passed the assessment order. The amount in dispute is not explicitly stated.
Key Issues
1. Whether the assessment order levying GST on the value of broken rice, bran, and husk obtained from custom milling of paddy is sustainable in light of the previous High Court order in W.P.No.45971 of 2018? (Question of law). Petitioner's contention: The subject matter of the writ petition is squarely covered by the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.45971 of 2018, dated 20.11.2020, and therefore, the same order should be applied. Revenue's contention: The learned Government Pleader for Commercial Tax representing the respondents did not dispute the petitioner's submission that the matter is covered by the previous High Court order.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE U. DURGA PRASAD RAO AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN
WRIT PETITION No.5641 of 2021
ORDER: (per UDPR,J)
This writ petition is filed challenging the assessment order passed by the 1st respondent levying GST on the value of broken rice, bran and husk obtained by the petitioner on custom milling of the paddy.
Heard learned counsel for petitioner, Sri G. Narendra Chetty, learned Government Pleader for Commercial Tax, representing on behalf of respondents 1 and 2, Sri P.Hema Chandra, learned standing counsel, representing on behalf of 3rd respondent and learned Assistant Solicitor General of India, representing on behalf of the 4th respondent.
When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for petitioner would submit that the subject matter in this writ petition is squarely covered by the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.45971 of 2018, dated 20.11.2020 and the same order may be passed in this writ petition also. Learned Government Pleader for Commercial Tax representing on behalf of respondents has not disputed the said fact.
Following the above said order and for the reasons recorded therein, this w
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Andhra Pradesh High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.