M/S Chillakuru Rama Mohan Reddy vs. Assistant Commissioner (St)
Held
The Court found that while the lockdown caused inconvenience, the petitioner did not communicate this to the assessing authority or seek adjournment. However, the Court acknowledged that relevant documents regarding tax liability and TDS were not considered by the assessing authority.
Facts
The petitioner challenged assessment orders that imposed tax, penalty, and interest due to discrepancies between payments received for works contracts and reported turnovers. The petitioner claimed they were unable to submit exemption documents due to the COVID-19 lockdown and violation of natural justice.
Key Issues
Whether the assessment orders were passed in violation of principles of natural justice due to lockdown restrictions and failure to consider relevant documents.
Sections Cited
GST Act, 2017
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE JOYMALYA BAGCHI AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURESH REDDY WRIT PETITION Nos.11857, 11860 and 11888 of 2021 (Taken up through video conferencing) COMMON ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Joymalya Bagchi)
Similar question of law and fact arises in these writ petitions.
Hence, the writ petitions are being disposed of by this common judgment & order.
In Writ Petition Nos.11857, 11860 and 11888 of 2021, petitioner has assailed assessment orders dated 06.02.2021 imposing tax, penalty and interest to the tune of Rs.22,44,905/-, 1, 35,00, 555/- and Rs.2,42,30,362/- for the periods April, 2019 to August, 2019, September 2019 to March, 2020 and May, 2018 to March 2019 respectively as payments received by him on works contract from the Forest Department did not tally with the turnovers reported through GSTR-3B forms respectively in W.P.Nos.11857 of 2021, 11860 of 2021 and 11888 of 2021. Mr. Suribabu, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, argues that his client was unable to submit relevant documents exempting the tax liability as the State was going through a lock- down and without giving his client adequate opportunity to submit such docu
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Andhra Pradesh High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.