M/S. Beekay Steel Industries LTD. vs. The Union Of INDIA
Held
The Court noted that the petitioner's ITC had been de-blocked. Therefore, the cause of action for the writ petition no longer survived.
Facts
The petitioner's Input Tax Credit (ITC) was blocked for over a year. The petitioner sought to strike down Rule 86A of the CGST/APGST Rules or declare the blocking of ITC illegal and arbitrary.
Key Issues
Whether Rule 86A of the CGST/APGST Rules is ultra vires and whether the blocking of ITC was illegal and arbitrary.
Sections Cited
Rule 86A, Section 16, Section 17, Section 49, Section 49A
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
Dt: 12.11.2021
(Prashant Kumar Mishra, CJ)
Alleging that the Input Tax Credit admissible to the petitioner was blocked on 28.01.2020 and is continuing for more than one year, the present writ petition has been preferred for the following reliefs:
“A. issue a Writ of Certiorari or such other Writ Order or direc
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Andhra Pradesh High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.