M/S Ganesh Agencies vs. State Of Andhra Pradesh
Held
The Court held that the Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products (Prohibition of Advertisement and Regulation of Trade and Commerce, Production, Supply and Distribution) Act, 2003 (COTPA, 2003) is a special Act specifically dealing with tobacco and tobacco products, including Pan Masala or any chewing material with tobacco. The Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 (FSSA, 2006) is a general Act concerning food safety. Since tobacco products are covered under COTPA, 2003, and following the precedent in Godawat Pan Masala Products I.P. Ltd. (supra), Pan Masala or Gutka containing tobacco cannot be considered 'food' under the FSSA, 2006. Consequently, the Commissioner of Food Safety, Andhra Pradesh, is neither authorized nor has jurisdiction to issue notifications prohibiting the manufacture, storage, distribution, transportation, and sale of such products under Section 30(2)(a) of the FSSA, 2006. The Court declared the impugned notifications void. As a result, the respondents were directed not to interfere with the lawful business activities of the writ petitioners concerning tobacco products. Any seizure of tobacco products under the impugned notifications or FSSA, 2006/FSSA Regulations, 2011 was held to be bad in law, and all seized products were ordered to be released forthwith. No further coercive action under the FSSA, 2006/FSSA Regulations, 2011 was permitted against licensed businesses.
Facts
A batch of writ petitions (W.P. Nos.8367, 8378, 8396, 9382, 9416, 9421, 9431 of 2021 and W.P.No.31710 of 2022) were filed before the High Court of Andhra Pradesh challenging various notifications. The core issue revolved around the authority of the Commissioner of Food Safety and other State Government officers to prohibit the manufacture, storage, distribution, transportation, and sale of Gutka/Pan Masala containing Tobacco and Nicotine, as well as chewing tobacco products. These prohibitions were purportedly issued under the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 (FSSA, 2006). The petitioners sought to quash these notifications and prevent interference with their business activities.
Key Issues
1. Whether the Commissioner of Food Safety, Andhra Pradesh, is authorized and has jurisdiction to issue notifications prohibiting the manufacture, storage, distribution, transportation, and sale of Gutka/Pan Masala containing Tobacco and Nicotine, and chewing tobacco products, under Section 30(2)(a) of the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 (FSSA, 2006)? Petitioner's arguments: The petitioners contended that the Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products (Prohibition of Advertisement and Regulation of Trade and Commerce, Production, Supply and Distribution) Act, 2003 (COTPA, 2003) is a special Act specifically governing tobacco products. They argued that Pan Masala or Gutka containing tobacco cannot be considered 'food' as defined under the FSSA, 2006, and therefore, the Commissioner of Food Safety lacks the jurisdiction to issue such prohibitory notifications under the FSSA, 2006. They relied on the precedent set in Godawat Pan Masala Products I.P. Ltd. (supra). Revenue/State's arguments: The judgment does not record any specific arguments made by the revenue or State.
Sections Cited
Section 30(2)(a), Section 3(m), Section 3(p)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH: AMARAVATI
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA, CHIEF JUSTICE & HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
W.P. Nos.8367, 8378, 8396, 9382, 9416, 9421, 9431 of 2021 and W.P.No.31710 of 2022 (Through physical mode) COMMON ORDER (ORAL) Dt:27.04.2023 (per Prashant Kumar Mishra, CJ)
Though different notifications have been challenged in this batch of writ petitions, in substance, the issue raised in this batch of writ petitions is concerning the powers of the Commissioner of Food Safety and any other officer of the State Government in prohibiting the manufacture, storage, distribution, transportation and sale of Gutka/Pan Masala, which contains Tobacco and Nicotine as ingredients and chewing tobacco products etc., within the meaning of Sections 3(m) and 3(p) of the Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products (Prohibition of Advertisement and Regulation of Trade and Commerce, Production, Supply and Distribution) Act, 2003. 2. Similar issue has been decided by this Court in W.P.No.30185 of 2021 and batch, vide common order dated 24.03.2023. The operative portion of the said order reads as follows:
HCJ & NJS,J W.P.No
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Andhra Pradesh High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.