Roopesh Educational Welfare Society (Rews) vs. The Union Of INDIA
Original PDF →No AI summary yet for this judgment.
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
The Court made the following : ORDER I A Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : SRI HARINATH N (DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA) dt. 19-07-2021 passed by the 4th Respondent Pending disposal of the above Writ Petition.
» 1 WRIT PETITION No.l4946 of 2023 ORDER; (Per Hon ’hie Sri Justice U.Durga Prasad Rao) 2. respondents. (a) Referring to the impugned Appeal Rejection Order dated 3. 31.05.2022, learned Government Pleader would submit that, the appeal was in fact rejected not only copies, but also in view of the fact that the same was filed beyond the V& condoriable period. (b) Learned Government Pleader would further submit that the respondent, but the appeal was filed on 26.11.2021 and since the appeal rejected. Heard learned counsel for petitioner Sri Harinath Reddy Soma and I learned Government Pleader for Commercial Tax representing the The challenge in this writ petition is to the Appeal Rejection Order dated 31.05.2022 passed by the 3"* respondent. HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE U. DURGA PRASAD RAO AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V. GOPALA KRISHNA RAO on the ground of non-receipt of certified was filed beyond the condonable period of 4 months, the same was impugned Assessment Order was passed on 19.07.2021 by the 4^*’
2
Learned counsel for petitioner would submit that the petitioner has fair chance of succeeding in the appeal and therefore, an opportunity may be given to the petitioner to pursue the appeal by condoning the delay.
Having regard to the above respective submissions, in the interest the petitioner depositing 20% of the demanded tax within four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, failing which, this order shall stands cancelled. No costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. / //// A of justice, the Writ Petition is allowed and the delay in filing the appeal is condoned with a direction to the 3"* respondent to admit the appeal and dispose of the same in accordance with the governing law and rules, by affording an opportunity of hearing to both the parties on the condition of K. SRINIVASA RAJU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ^SECTIONOFFI^R . The Secretary, Union of India, Ministry of Finance, North Block, New Delhi. 2 The Principal Secretary, Revenue CTII Department, State of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat Building, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Andhra Pradesh.
The Joint Commissioner, State Taxes Appellate Authority, Mogalrajapuram, Near Siddhartha College, Vijayawada.
The Assistant Commissioner, Goods and Services Tax, Chittoor-I Circle,
One CC to SRI. HARINATH REDDY SOMA Advocate [OPUC]
One CC to SRI. HARINATH N (DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA) fOPUCl 7 Two CCS to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. {OUT] 8’ Two CCS to GP FOR COMMERCIAL TAX, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]
Two CD Copies MSR Sk
HIGH COURT DATED: 14/07/2023 ORDER WP.No.14946 of 2023 SrA‘A io/o&/?5 ALLOWING THE WP WITHOUT COSTS J I* '
Reproduced from the public record of the Andhra Pradesh High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.