Pranav Associates vs. Superintendent GST
Original PDF →No AI summary yet for this judgment.
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
legal flaw in the impugned order.
In reply, learned counsel for petitioner would submit that after cancellation of the registration, the petitioner filed returns till the date of cancellation and requested that the writ petition may be allowed and the 1st respondent may be directed to consider his returns and revoke the cancellation order in the interest of justice.
In view of the above respective submissions, this writ petition is allowed and the 1st respondent is directed to consider the returns said to be submitted by the petitioner and pass an
2 appropriate order regarding the revocation of the cancellation of the GST Registration of the petitioner expeditiously but not the later than one week from the date of receipt of copy of this order. No costs.
As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________ U.DURGA PRASAD RAO, J
___________________________________ VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J 11.08.2023 Note: issue C.C. by 16.08.2023. B/o.SS
Reproduced from the public record of the Andhra Pradesh High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.