Vemagiri Anjali vs. The State Of Andhra Pradesh

WP/1201/2023HC Andhra PradeshGSTCNR APHC01002351202320 August 2023Bench: VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA5 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

Held

The Court noted that the facts were admitted by both counsel. The Court directed the 4th respondent college to forward the petitioner's representation dated May 8, 2023, to the 3rd respondent University within one week. The 3rd respondent University was then directed to consider the representation and pass appropriate orders within two weeks. Following the University's decision, the petitioner was to pay the dues and penalty as prescribed under Rule 15. Upon compliance by the petitioner, the 4th respondent college was directed to release the original documents within three working days. The Court disposed of the Writ Petition with no order as to costs. The reasoning was based on facilitating a resolution by directing the relevant authorities to process the petitioner's request according to the applicable rules, ensuring the return of documents upon payment of the determined dues and penalty.

Facts

The petitioner, who secured admission to a BDS course at the 4th respondent college, submitted original documents and paid Rs. 50,000/- towards tuition fees. The total tuition fee for the four-year course was Rs. 2,09,000/-. The petitioner later decided to withdraw from the course to pursue another by retaking the NEET examination and requested the return of her original documents. She submitted a representation on May 8, 2023, but received no response or return of documents. The 3rd respondent (University) argued that as per the Andhra Pradesh Un-aided Non-Minority Professional Institutions (Regulations of Admissions into Under Graduate Medical and Dental Professional Courses) Rules, 2007, a candidate withdrawing mid-course must pay a discontinuation fee of Rs. 1,00,000/- for BDS, plus applicable GST.

Key Issues

1. Whether the 4th respondent's demand for the entire tuition fee for all four years for the return of the petitioner's original documents is illegal, arbitrary, and a violation of her fundamental rights? (Question of law and fact, turning on principles of contract law and constitutional rights). 2. What is the applicable fee or penalty for a student withdrawing from the BDS course after admissions have closed, as per the relevant rules and government orders? Petitioner's Arguments: The petitioner argued that the demand for the entire tuition fee for all four years for the return of her original documents was illegal and arbitrary. She sought the return of her documents without being compelled to pay the full course fee, asserting a violation of her fundamental rights. Respondents' Arguments: The respondents, specifically the 3rd respondent (University) and supported by the 4th respondent (college), contended that as per Rule 6(p) of the Andhra Pradesh Un-aided Non-Minority Professional Institutions (Regulations of Admissions into Under Graduate Medical and Dental Professional Courses) Rules, 2007, and cancellation instructions, a candidate withdrawing mid-course is liable to pay a discontinuation fee of Rs. 1,00,000/- for BDS, plus applicable GST. They relied on G.O.Ms.No.72 dated 15.07.2019.

Sections Cited

Rule 6(p), Rule 15

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION No.1201 of 2023

ORDER: The present Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking following relief: “…to issue an appropriate order, writ or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 4th respondent in demanding the petitioner herein demanded to pay the entire tuition fee for all the 4 years for returning the original documents i.e., SSC Marks Memo, Intermediate Certificate, Intermediate Transfer Certificate, Study and Conduct Certificate from 6th to 10th, Caste Certificate belonging to the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and violation of Fundamental Rights guaranteed under Constitution of India and consequently direct the 4th respondent not to insist for payment of entire tuition fee for all the 4 years for returning the original documents i.e., SSC Marks Memo, Intermediate Certificate, Intermediate Transfer Certificate, Study and Conduct Certificate from 6th to 10th Caste Certificate belonging to the petitioner and further direct the 4th respondent to return the original documents bel

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Andhra Pradesh High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.