Sri Durga Vengamamba Timber Depot vs. The State Of Ap

WP/19534/2023HC Andhra PradeshGSTCNR APHC01038094202304 December 2023Bench: RAVI NATH TILHARI,A V RAVINDRA BABU7 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

Held

The Court considered the submissions of both parties and the Notification No. 53/2023 - Central Tax, dated November 2, 2023. This notification allows taxable persons who could not file an appeal against an order passed under Section 73 or 74 of the CGST Act, 2017, within the prescribed time, to file an appeal on or before January 31, 2024, subject to fulfilling specific conditions. These conditions include paying the admitted portion of tax, interest, fine, fee, and penalty, and 12.5% of the disputed tax amount, with at least 20% of that amount paid from the Electronic Cash Ledger. The Court noted that the Government Pleader did not dispute the applicability of this notification. Therefore, the Court disposed of the writ petition, granting the petitioner liberty to approach the appellate authority by complying with the terms and conditions of the notification dated November 2, 2023, in accordance with the law. No costs were ordered. The issue of the assessment order's legality was not directly decided but was rendered moot by the opportunity to appeal.

Facts

The petitioner, M/s. Sri Durga Vengamamba Timber Depot, filed a writ petition challenging an assessment order in Form DRC-07 dated March 27, 2019, passed by the Assistant Commissioner(ST), Bhavanipuram Circle. This order pertained to the tax period from July 1, 2017, to May 22, 2018, and levied CGST and SGST of Rs. 14,05,924/- each, along with a penalty of Rs. 14,05,924/- each for CGST and SGST, totaling Rs. 56,23,696/-. The petitioner sought to declare this action illegal, arbitrary, without authority of law, and void ab initio. The petitioner also sought a stay on recovery proceedings. The Government Pleader for Commercial Tax did not dispute the petition and submitted that it could be decided finally considering a recent notification.

Key Issues

1. Whether the action of the 2nd respondent in passing the assessment order in Form DRC-07 dated 27-03-2019, for the tax period 01-07-2017 to 22-05-2018, levying tax and penalty totaling Rs. 56,23,696/-, is illegal, arbitrary, without authority of law, and without jurisdiction, as contended by the petitioner. Petitioner's Argument: The petitioner argued that the assessment order was illegal and sought its setting aside. They relied on Notification No. 53/2023 - Central Tax, dated November 2, 2023, which provides a special procedure for filing appeals against orders passed under Sections 73 or 74 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, even if the appeal period has expired, subject to certain conditions. Revenue's Argument: The learned Government Pleader for Commercial Tax did not dispute the applicability of the notification and submitted that the writ petition could be decided finally considering it.

Sections Cited

Section 73, Section 74, Section 107, Section 148

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A V RAVINDRA BABU WRIT PETITION NO: 19534 OF 2023 Between: M/s. Sri Durga Vengamamba Timber Depot, D. No.3/1/214/6, Tunnel Road, Rama Rajya Nagar, Vijayawada. Represented by its Proprietor, Mrs. Allii Kondaiah, S/o. Allusubbaiah, ...PETITIONER AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue (CT- II) Department, A.P. Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District, AP.

2.

Assistant Commissioner(ST), Bhavanipuram Circle, No-I Division, Vijayawada.

3.

Deputy Assistant Commissioner (ST), Bhavanipuram Circle, No-ll Division, Vijayawada. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, direction or order more particularly in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaration the action of the 2"'^ respondent in passing the assessment order in Form DRC-07, Dt. 27-03-2019, for the t

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Andhra Pradesh High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.