M/S.Adhunik Infratech INDIA Private Limited vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax
Held
The Court modified the garnishee order, setting aside orders against three contractors and restricting the order against one contractor. The petitioner is to deposit tax dues upon receiving payments from the contractors.
Facts
The petitioner, a sub-contractor, sought relief against a garnishee order issued by the tax department. The petitioner had executed works for four contractors who were engaged by the State, and amounts were due to the petitioner from these contractors. The tax dues were less than the amounts owed to the petitioner.
Key Issues
Whether the garnishee order was equitable and appropriate given the amounts due to the petitioner from government contractors, and if the tax authorities acted appropriately in issuing such orders.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
order.
Learned senior counsel would submit that the petitioner has expended money from his pocket and executed projects for four contractors, all of whom have been engaged by the State for executing certain infrastructure projects, conceptualized by the State. There is no dispute with regard
2 to the said fact. It is pertinent to record here the submission of the learned G
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Andhra Pradesh High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.