S V V Rambabu vs. The State Of Andhra Pradesh

WP/2490/2022HC Andhra PradeshGSTCNR APHC01002736202206 February 2024Bench: VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA3 pages
AI SummaryPartly Allowed

Held

The Court held that the action of the respondents in withholding the bill amount of Rs.40,57,966/- after the successful completion of works, without any justification, is illegal and arbitrary. The Court noted that the petitioner's case was "pitiable" and that public authorities have a responsibility to fulfill contractual obligations promptly. The Court directed the respondent authorities to pay the bill amount of Rs.40,57,966/- to the petitioner along with interest at the rate of 6% per annum. This direction was based on the judgment of the Division Bench of the High Court in Writ Appeal No.724 of 2021 and batch dated 12.10.2023. The payment was to be made within six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the order. The Court also clarified that it would be open for the petitioner to agitate their claim for any differential amount or higher rate of interest in an appropriate forum.

Facts

The petitioner, a contractor, undertook repair works in West Godavari District. The net payable amount for the completed works was determined to be Rs.40,57,966/-. Despite the completion of works and the expiry of the default liability period, the respondent authorities have not released the payment. The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus to declare the withholding of the amount as illegal and arbitrary, and for consequential directions to pay the amount with interest. An interim order dated 25.03.2022 directing payment within six weeks was not complied with.

Key Issues

1. Whether the action of the respondents in withholding the bill amount of Rs.40,57,966/- after the successful completion of works is illegal, arbitrary, and violative of the principles of natural justice, as contended by the petitioner? 2. Whether the petitioner is entitled to payment of the withheld bill amount along with interest, as sought in the writ petition? Petitioner's Contentions: The petitioner argued that the works were successfully completed to the satisfaction of the authorities, and the bill amount of Rs.40,57,966/- was finalized. They contended that withholding this amount without any reason is illegal, arbitrary, and violates principles of natural justice. The petitioner also relied on the interim order of the Court dated 25.03.2022, which was not complied with, and sought payment with interest. Respondents' Contentions: No counter was filed by the respondents, and therefore, no arguments were recorded on their behalf.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

1 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA

WRIT PETITION No.2490 Of 2022

ORDER:-

1.

The petitioner seeks writ of mandamus to declare the action of the respondents in withholding and not releasing an amount of Rs.40,57,966/-, even after execution of works, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice and for a consequential direction.

2.

The petitioner’s case is that, the petitioner has undertaken certain repair works in West Godavari District and successfully completed those works. The net amount payable to the petitioner was concluded at Rs.40,57,966/-. On completion of the agreed works, the respondent authorities did not pay the amount till date. Though the works were completed long back and the default liability period of two years was also completed, still, the respondent authorities have not returned the amount. Hence, the writ petition is preferred seeking a direction to the respondents to pay the amount with interest.

3.

Heard. No counter is filed by the respondents.

4.

As can be seen, the petitioner’s case is a pitiable one. The petitio

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Andhra Pradesh High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.