M/S. Udayam Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra Pradesh
Held
The Court held that the non-payment of admitted dues by the respondents was arbitrary, aligning with previous judicial pronouncements. The Court directed the respondents to release the admitted amount of Rs. 26,01,470/- to the petitioner. Furthermore, the Court directed the respondents to pay interest on this amount at the rate of 6% per annum, referencing a judgment of the Division Bench of the High Court in Writ Appeal No.724 of 2021 and batch dated 12.10.2023. The payment, including interest, was ordered to be made within three months from the date of receipt of the order. The petitioner was also granted liberty to pursue their claim for a higher rate of interest or any other due amounts in an appropriate forum. The Court did not expressly leave any issue undecided, as all contentions were addressed by the final directions.
Facts
M/s. Udayam Constructions (the petitioner) was awarded a contract for works in Krishna District, for which final bills were prepared amounting to Rs. 32,34,247/-. The respondents failed to make the payment, prompting the petitioner to file a writ petition. The petitioner contended that the respondents admitted an amount of Rs. 26,01,470/- was payable but no payment was being made, which was considered arbitrary. The respondents, through the Executive Engineer, Bhimavaram, admitted the payable amount of Rs. 26,01,470/- and stated that payments would be cleared soon after the release of the Letter of Credit (LOC).
Key Issues
1. Whether the non-payment of admitted dues by the respondents to the petitioner is arbitrary and warrants interference by this Court, as per the principles laid down in previous judgments of this Court? 2. Whether the petitioner is entitled to interest on the delayed payment of admitted dues, and if so, at what rate? Petitioner's Contentions: The petitioner argued that the non-payment of the admitted amount of Rs. 26,01,470/- was arbitrary and high-handed. They relied on previous orders of the Court, including a Single Judge's order dated 05.10.2021 in W.P.No.10038 of 2021 and batch, which held such non-payment as arbitrary and requiring prompt clearance. Respondents' Contentions: The learned Government Pleader for Irrigation placed on record written instructions admitting the payable amount of Rs. 26,01,470/- and submitted that payments would be cleared upon release of the LOC. The respondents also implicitly acknowledged the entitlement to interest based on the Division Bench judgment cited by the Court.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
ORDER:
The petitioner had been awarded the contract of work(s) under the subject scheme in Krishna District. After execution of the said contract, final bills were prepared for a sum of Rs.32,34,247/- as per the sanctioned orders. As the payment of the said amount has not been made by the respondents, the petitioner has approached this Court by way of this writ petition.
It is the contention of the petitioner that even though the respondents admitted that the petitioner is entitled for payment of Rs.26,01,470/-, no payment is being made. The petitioner contends that such non-payment of money
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Andhra Pradesh High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.