Siva Nagasai Cool Drinks And General Stores vs. The State Of A.P
Held
The Court allowed the writ petition in terms of a common order dated 24.03.2023 passed in W.P.No.30185 of 2021 and batch. The reasoning adopted by the Division Bench in the cited order was that the Cigarette and Other Tobacco Products Act (COTPA), 2003, is a special Act specifically dealing with tobacco and tobacco products, including pan masala or any chewing material with tobacco. The Food Safety and Standards Act (FSSA), 2006, is a general Act concerning food. Consequently, tobacco products cannot be considered 'food' under the FSSA, 2006. Therefore, the Commissioner of Food Safety, Andhra Pradesh, was neither authorized nor had jurisdiction to issue the impugned notification under Section 30(2)(a) of the FSSA, 2006. The Court declared the Commissioner's lack of authority and jurisdiction to issue such a notification. As a consequence, the respondents were directed not to interfere with the lawful day-to-day business activities of the writ petitioners concerning tobacco products. Seizures made under the impugned notifications or FSSA were held to be bad in law, and seized products were to be released. No further coercive action could be taken under FSSA against licensed businesses. The writ petitions were allowed to the extent indicated.
Facts
The petitioner, Siva Nagasai Cool Drinks And General Stores, filed a writ petition challenging a notification dated 06.11.2021 issued by the respondents. The petitioner sought to declare the notification illegal, arbitrary, and without jurisdiction, and to prevent the respondents from interfering with their business of producing, distributing, transporting, and selling tobacco products like khaini and gutka, for which they possess requisite licenses and pay GST. The petition also sought to prevent the registration of cases related to this business. The matter was listed for dismissal due to the absence of the petitioner's representation on previous and current hearing dates. The Government Pleader for the respondents submitted that similar challenges to notifications have been decided by a Division Bench of the High Court.
Key Issues
1. Whether the notification dated 06.11.2021, issued by the Commissioner of Food Safety, Andhra Pradesh, prohibiting the manufacture, storage, distribution, transportation, and sale of Gutka/Pan Masala containing Tobacco and Nicotine, and Chewing Tobacco products, is without jurisdiction and in violation of the principles of natural justice and constitutional provisions (Articles 19(1)(g) and 21)? Petitioner's contention: The petitioner argued that their business of selling tobacco products is lawful, covered under the Cigarette and Other Tobacco Products Act (COTPA), and they hold the necessary licenses and pay GST. They contended that the impugned notification is illegal, arbitrary, and issued without jurisdiction, violating their fundamental rights. Respondent's contention: The Government Pleader relied on a common order passed by a Division Bench of the High Court in W.P.No.30185 of 2021 and batch, which dealt with similar notifications. The Division Bench held that COTPA, 2003, is a special Act for tobacco products, while the Food Safety and Standards Act (FSSA), 2006, is a general Act dealing with food. Therefore, the Commissioner of Food Safety lacks the jurisdiction to issue such a notification concerning tobacco products.
Sections Cited
Section 30(2)(a), Section 3(j), Section 3(m), Section 3(p)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
The Court made the following: ORDER:-
This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of the India seeking the following reliefs:- “to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the notification No.318/FSSA/AP/2014-20, dated 06.11.2021,issued by respondents as being illegal, arbitrary without jurisdiction and in violation of principles of natural justice and in violation of Articles 19(1)(g) and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently to set aside the same and direct the respondents not to interfere with the day to day business activities of productions, di
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Andhra Pradesh High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.