M/S. Tirumala Dairy PVT LTD., Narsaraopet. vs. The Asst.Commercial Tax Officer, Narsaraopet.
Original PDF →No AI summary yet for this judgment.
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
The Court made the following Order :
APHC010568972006 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Juri iction) [3488] MONDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 13266/2006 Between; ...PETITIONER M/s. Tirumala Dairy Pvt Ltd., Narsaraopet. AND ...RESPONDENT The Asst Commercial Tax Officer Narsaraopet Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.M VJ K KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent: 1.GP FOR COMMERCIAL TAX 2.GP FOR INDUSTRIES COMMERCE The Court made the following Order: (perHon’ble Sri Justice R Raghunandan Rao) The petitioner is a diary involved in the supply of milk as well as manufacture of milk products and supply of such products in the State of Andhra Pradesh. It was a registered dealer under the A.P. GST Act, 1957 and CST Act, 1956 for the financial year 2003-2004. The petitioner for the purposes of packing the milk and milk products, sold by the petitioner, had purchased certain packaging material from other States and had issued ‘C’ Forms to the dealers, who had sold the packaging material to the petitioner. 2. ,
I The respondent herein, had issued a show-cause notice to the ^ petitioner, contending that the petitioner could not have issued ‘C’ Forms against the purchase of packaging material, as the said products/goods had not been included in the certificate of registration under the CST Act. The respondent proposed levy of penalty, for such misuse by invoking Section 10(A) of the CST Act, 1956.
The petitioner resisted the said proposal on the ground that the milk and milk products which are being sold by the petitioner cannot be sold without being packaged properly and as such, the non-inclusion of the packaging material in the registration certificate of the petitioner cannot
result in the petitioner being penalized for issuing ‘C’ Forms for such purposes. The respondent by an order dated 15.06.2006, had rejected the said contentions and had levied a penalty of Rs.21,82,515/- against the petitioner. Aggrieved by the said order, the petitioner has approached this Court by way of the present Writ Petition.
Fleard Sri M.V.J.K. Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Commercial Taxes. The learned Government Pleader for Commercial Taxes has placed a judgment of a Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court dated 20.10.2022 in W.P.No.12058 of 2002 and contends that the issue raised in the present Writ Petition had been considered by the said Flon’ble Division Bench and orders have been passed in favour of the Revenue.
A perusal of the said judgment would show that ‘C’ Forms used by a cold storage unit against the purchases made by the said cold storage unit from other States were not accepted on the ground that the non-inclusion of such goods in the registration certificate, under the CST Act, would preclude such dealers from utilizing ‘C’ Forms and consequently such utilization would attract penalties under the Act. 8. t;
We are in respectful agreement with the said down by the Hon’ble Division Bench, dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any. shall stand closed. proposition of law laid Consequently, this Writ Petition is P.VENKAT RAMANA JOINT^REGISTRAR k //// SECTI OFFICER To,
One CC to SRI. M V J K KUMAR Advocate [OPUCJ-
Two CCs toGP FOR COMMERCIAL Pradesh. [OUT]
Two CCs to GP FOR INDUSTRIES Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]
Three CD Copies TAX, High Court of Andhra & COMMERCE, High Court of DPBR
HIGH COURT DATED:29/07/2024 ORDER WP.No.13266 of 2006 DISMISSING THE WP WITHOUT COSTS
Reproduced from the public record of the Andhra Pradesh High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.