M/S. Nava Bharat Enterprises Limited vs. The Commissioner Of Central Tax

WP/4684/2022HC Andhra PradeshGSTCNR APHC01006374202223 September 2024Bench: G.NARENDAR,KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA3 pages
AI SummaryWithdrawn

Held

The Court permitted the petitioner to withdraw the Writ Petitions. The Court granted the petitioner the liberty to file a separate Writ Petition to challenge both the show cause notice and the adjudication order. The reasoning for this decision was based on the petitioner's submission that the adjudication proceedings had been completed during the pendency of the writ petitions, necessitating a fresh challenge to encompass all aspects of the revenue's action. The Court's operative direction was to allow the withdrawal of the writ petitions with the specified liberty. No issues were expressly left undecided, as the matter was disposed of on the procedural request of the petitioner.

Facts

The petitioner filed Writ Petition Nos. 4684 and 4686 of 2022 before the High Court. During the pendency of these writ petitions, the competent authority completed the adjudication proceedings and issued adjudication orders. The petitioner's counsel then requested permission to withdraw the writ petitions. The petitioner sought liberty to file a fresh writ petition to challenge both the show cause notice and the subsequent adjudication order.

Key Issues

1. Whether the petitioner should be permitted to withdraw the present Writ Petitions with liberty to file a fresh Writ Petition challenging the show cause notice and the adjudication order? Petitioner's Argument: The petitioner argued that since the adjudication proceedings have been completed and orders passed during the pendency of the writ petitions, they should be allowed to withdraw the current petitions. They sought liberty to file a new writ petition to raise a comprehensive challenge to both the show cause notice and the adjudication order, thereby addressing the entire procedural and substantive issues arising from the revenue's action. Revenue's Argument: The judgment does not record any specific arguments from the revenue or State. However, the Court's order implies that the revenue did not object to the petitioner's request for withdrawal with liberty to file a fresh petition.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
1 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.NARENDAR AND HON’BLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION Nos. 4684 and 4686 of 2022 COMMON ORDER:- (per Hon’ble Sri Justice G.Narendar) 1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and Smt. Shanti Chandra, learned counsel for the respondents. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pending disposal of the Writ Petitions, the competent authority has completed the adjudication proceedings and passed adjudication orders and in that view, a prayer is made to the Court to permit the petitioner to withdraw the Writ Petition with liberty to file a separate Writ Petition and therein raise a challenge both to the

show cause notice and the adjudication order.

3.

Reserving such liberty, the Writ Petitions are permitted to be withdrawn.

4.

Accordingly, these Writ Petitions are dismissed as withdrawn.

2

5.

As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in these Writ Petitions shall stand closed.

_______________ G.NARENDAR, J

__________________________

KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA, J

Dated 24th September, 2024 PKR

3

HO

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Andhra Pradesh High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.