The Principal Commissioner vs. M/S Vijayakrant Constructions
Held
The Court accepted the submission made by the appellant-Department's counsel. Based on the Department's litigation policy, which precludes pursuing appeals with monetary stakes below Rs. 2 Crores, the Court allowed the withdrawal of the appeal. The reasoning is directly tied to the Department's internal policy, which the Court acknowledged and acted upon. There were no findings on the merits of the case, as the appeal was disposed of on a procedural ground. The operative direction was to dismiss the appeal as withdrawn, with no costs awarded.
Facts
The appellant-Department, represented by its learned counsel, filed a memo before the High Court. This memo included a copy of a circular outlining the Department's litigation policy. According to this policy, the Department resolved not to initiate appeals or petitions where the monetary stakes were less than Rs. 2 Crores. Consequently, the counsel prayed for leave to withdraw the present appeal.
Key Issues
The Court did not have to decide any substantive legal issues as the appeal was withdrawn. The sole procedural matter was the appellant-Department's request to withdraw the appeal based on its internal litigation policy. The Department argued that its litigation policy mandated the withdrawal of appeals with monetary stakes below Rs. 2 Crores, and therefore, it sought permission to withdraw the present appeal. The judgment does not record any arguments from the respondent side.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
1
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.NARENDAR
AND HON’BLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA JUDGMENT:- (per Hon’ble Sri Justice G.Narendar)
The learned counsel for the appellant-Department has filed a memo into Court, including a copy of the circular whereby, the appellant-Department has formulated a litigation policy and under the said policy, it has been resolved not to initiate any appeals or petitions, where the monetary stakes involved are less than Rs.2 Crores and hence, he prays leave of the Court to withdraw the appeal.
Submission is placed on record.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this appeal shall stand closed.
______________ G.NARENDAR, J
_________________________
KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA, J 25.10.2024. PKR
2
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.NARENDAR
AND HON’BLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA
225 25.10.2024 PKR
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Andhra Pradesh High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.