The Commissioner Of Customs vs. Olam Agri INDIA Private Limited

WA/736/2024HC Andhra PradeshGSTCNR APHC01035598202406 November 2024Bench: DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR,R RAGHUNANDAN RAO3 pages
AI SummaryWithdrawn

Held

The Court noted the submission by the learned counsel for the appellants that a new notification, No.31/2024-25, dated 20.09.2024, has been issued by the Directorate General of Foreign Trade. This notification has revised the policy for the export of Non-Basmati White Rice, moving it from a prohibited to a free category. Due to this change in policy, the issues that formed the basis of the present writ appeals have been rendered academic. The Court acknowledged that the issues raised in these appeals would remain open for decision in any future appropriate case if the need arises. Consequently, the writ appeals were disposed of without delving into the merits of the original dispute.

Facts

The appellants, the Commissioner of Customs and others, filed these writ appeals challenging an order or action (not specified in detail) concerning the export of Non-Basmati White Rice. The respondents are Manasa Quality Enterprises Limited and others. The appeals were filed before the High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati. The core of the dispute revolved around the policy governing the export of Non-Basmati White Rice, which was previously in a prohibited category.

Key Issues

1. Whether the policy governing the export of Non-Basmati White Rice, as it stood at the time of the impugned action, was legally valid and applicable. Appellants' Contention: The appellants stated that a fresh notification, No.31/2024-25, dated 20.09.2024, issued by the Ministry of Commerce & Industry, Department of Commerce, Directorate General of Foreign Trade, New Delhi, has revised the policy for export of Non-Basmati White Rice from the prohibited category to the free category. Consequently, the issues raised in the present writ appeals have become academic. Respondents' Contention: No specific arguments were recorded for the respondents in the provided text.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

APHC010356042024

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

WRIT APPEAL NO: 735 of 2024 along with W.A.Nos.736, 737, 738, 739, 740, 741, 742, 743, 744, 760, 761, 813, 814, 815 & 816 of 2024 & W.A.(SR) Nos.31135, 31151 & 31153 of 2024 Bench Sr.No:- 34-52 [3446] ********** Advocate for Appellants: Mr. Y. N. Vivekananda Advocates for Respondents: Mr. G. L. Nageswara Rao Mr. Y. V. Anil Kumar, Central Government Counsel Mr. B. Narasimha Sarma, Additional Solicitor General of India

CORAM : THE CHIEF JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO DATE : 7th November 2024 P C :

Mr. Y. N. Vivekananda, learned counsel appearing for the appellants states that in view of the issuance of the fresh notification No.31/2024-25, dated 20.09.2024, by the Ministry of Commerce & Industry, Department of Commerce, Directorate General of Foreign Trade, New Delhi, whereby the policy for export of Non-Basmati White Rice has been revised to bring it from 2 HCJ & RRR, J W.A.No.735 of 2024 & batch

the prohibited category

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Andhra Pradesh High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.