M/S.Sai Traders vs. Assistant Commissioner

WP/27135/2024HC Andhra PradeshGSTCNR APHC01051827202403 December 2024Bench: R RAGHUNANDAN RAO,MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM3 pages
For Petitioner: S SURI BABUFor Respondent: GP FOR COMMERCIAL TAX
AI SummaryWithdrawn

Held

The Court permitted the petitioner to withdraw the Writ Petition. The petitioner was granted liberty to file an appeal against the order of rejection of revocation of cancellation. This permission was granted subject to the condition that the petitioner files the appeal within one week from the date of the order. The Court also directed that the appeal be considered without reference to the period of limitation. The Court did not decide on the merits of the underlying dispute regarding the cancellation or revocation, as the petition was withdrawn. No specific GST provisions were discussed in detail in the context of the decision.

Facts

The petitioner, M/s. Sai Traders, filed a Writ Petition before the High Court of Andhra Pradesh. The petition challenged an order passed by the Assistant Commissioner and others. The specific order under challenge is not detailed, but the petitioner sought to withdraw the Writ Petition. The petitioner's counsel requested permission to withdraw the petition with the liberty to file an appeal against an order of rejection of revocation of a cancellation order. The tax period and the amount in dispute are not recorded in the judgment. The procedural history leading to the Writ Petition is not detailed, other than the filing of the petition itself.

Key Issues

1. Whether the petitioner should be permitted to withdraw the Writ Petition with liberty to file an appeal against the order of rejection of revocation of cancellation. The petitioner argued that they sought to withdraw the Writ Petition to pursue an appeal against the order rejecting the revocation of cancellation. The petitioner's counsel specifically requested leave to file an appeal. The respondents' contentions are not recorded in the judgment. No specific provisions of the GST Act or Rules were explicitly discussed in relation to the arguments presented.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
APHC010518272024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3508] WEDNESDAY ,THE FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 27135/2024 Between: M/s.sai Traders, ...PETITIONER AND Assistant Commissioner and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. S SURI BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR COMMERCIAL TAX

The Court made the following Order: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao)

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw this Writ Petition with leave to file an appeal against the order of rejection of revocation of the cancellation order. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of permitting the writ petitioner to file necessary appeal without reference to the period of limitation subject to the condition of the petitioner filing the appeal within the next one week.

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed.

_____________________________ JUSTICE R.RAGHUNANDAN RAO

___________________________________

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Andhra Pradesh High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.