Srichakra Milk Products LLP vs. Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St)

WP/10294/2023HC Andhra PradeshGSTCNR APHC01018081202329 December 2024Bench: R RAGHUNANDAN RAO,MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM14 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

Held

The High Court allowed all the writ petitions. The Court held that flavoured milk should be taxed under tariff heading No. 0402 9990. This decision was based on a previous judgment of the same Court dated 10.12.2024 in W.P.No. 254 of 2024, where the Court had considered the material placed before it and concluded that flavoured milk falls under tariff heading No. 402 and ought to be taxed accordingly. Consequently, all orders passed by the revenue authorities to the contrary were set aside. The Assessing Authority was directed to redo the assessments in accordance with the Court's directions. The Court also noted that interlocutory applications, if any, pending in these matters stood closed. No order as to costs was made.

Facts

These writ petitions involved multiple petitioners, including M/s. Srichakra Milk Products LLP and M/s. Sangam Milk Producer Company Limited, challenging orders passed by various GST and Commercial Tax authorities. The core dispute revolved around the classification and tax rate applicable to flavoured milk. Specifically, petitioners argued that flavoured milk should be taxed under HSN Code 0402 9990 at 5% (2.5% CGST and 2.5% SGST) as per specific notifications. The impugned orders, passed for various tax periods ranging from April 2019-March 2020 to July 2017-March 2018, and even pre-GST periods under APVAT Act, classified flavoured milk under a different tariff heading, leading to higher tax demands. Petitioners also challenged the procedural validity of some orders, citing lack of proper signatures. The tax periods under dispute varied across the petitions.

Key Issues

1. Whether flavoured milk should be classified under HSN Code 0402 9990 and taxed at 5% (CGST 2.5%, SGST 2.5%) as contended by the petitioners, or under tariff heading 2202 9930 as determined by the revenue authorities, based on Notification No. 1/2017-Central Tax (Rate) and G.O.Ms.No.258? Petitioner's arguments: The petitioners contended that flavoured milk squarely falls under HSN Code 0402 9990, which is specifically covered by the aforementioned notification and G.O., attracting a 5% tax rate. They argued that the impugned orders misclassifying the product and demanding higher taxes were illegal and contrary to law. In some instances, petitioners also challenged the validity of the orders due to the absence of proper manual or digital signatures. Revenue's arguments: The revenue authorities, through their counsel, argued for the classification of flavoured milk under tariff heading 2202 9930, implying a different tax treatment. Specific arguments from the revenue side regarding the classification and validity of the orders are not explicitly detailed in the provided text, but their actions in passing the impugned orders indicate their stance on the taxability and classification.

Sections Cited

Section 73, Section 129, Rule 86A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R.RAGHUNANDAN RAO AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION Nos: 10296 of 2023, 20807 of 2020. 2453 of 2022, 10294 & 10324 of 2023 WRIT PETITION NO: 10296 OF 2023 Between; M/s.

Srichakra Milk Products LLP, rep. by its Partner, Mr. R.M.Ramakrishna, 23B-2-2-29B, Sri Varasiddi Vinayaka Complex, Bendapudivari Street, Ramachandraraopet, Eluru-534 002, West Godavari District. ...Petitioner AND Deputy Assistant Commissioner (ST), Eluru-1, Eluru, Andhra Pradesh.

Assistant Commissioner (ST) (FAC), Eluru-1 Circle, Eluru, Andhra Pradesh.

State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary to Government Revenue (CT-II) Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District.

Union of India, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Government of India, Ministry of Finance, 3'”'^ Floor, Jeevan Deep Building, Sansad Marg, New Delhi-110 001. 1. 2. 3. 4. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Andhra Pradesh High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.