Shaik Jani vs. The State Of Andhra Pradesh
Held
The Court allowed the writ petition. It directed the respondents to release the amount of Rs. 5,55,026/- to the petitioner within two months from the date of receipt of the order. This direction was based on the petitioner's entitlement, as per the judgment of the Division Bench of the High Court in Writ Appeal No. 724 of 2021 and batch of cases dated 12.10.2023. The Court also noted that if the petitioner was entitled to any higher amount, that would also be paid. The Court did not expressly leave any issue undecided, as the core issue of payment was addressed.
Facts
The petitioner, Shaik Jani, filed a writ petition seeking payment of Rs. 5,55,026/- out of a gross amount of Rs. 6,02,569/- for work done under Agreement No. 19KW/2023-24, dated 01.07.2023, involving O&M repairs to canal branches. The petitioner contended that the respondents admitted the entitlement but failed to make the payment, which was considered arbitrary. The respondents, through the Executive Engineer, K.W. Division, Tenali, admitted the work value as Rs. 6,55,586/- (including work done, NAC, and GST) and confirmed the work completion on 27.12.2023. However, they cited non-availability of funds as the reason for non-payment, assuring payment upon fund release.
Key Issues
1. Whether the respondents' failure to pay the admitted amount of Rs. 5,55,026/- to the petitioner for completed work under Agreement No. 19KW/2023-24 is illegal, arbitrary, and violative of Articles 14, 19(1)(g), and 21 of the Constitution of India? Petitioner's arguments: The petitioner argued that despite the respondents admitting the entitlement to the payment, the non-payment was arbitrary and high-handed, necessitating court intervention. The petitioner sought a direction for immediate payment of the first and final bill. Respondents' arguments: The respondents, while admitting the claim and the value of work done, attributed the delay in payment to the non-availability of funds. They assured that payments would be made once funds were released by the Government. They relied on written instructions from the Executive Engineer.
Sections Cited
Not Specified
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
ORDER:
This writ petition is filed seeking the following relief:
“…to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of Respondents in not paying the first and final bill an amount of Rs.5,55,026/-, out of gross amount of Rs.6,02,569/-, to the petitioner, in respect of the Work Agreement No.19KW/2023-24, dated 01.07.2023, for execution of O&M Repairs to shutters of branches of Commamuru canal from 58.000K.M to 65.000K.M under Project Committee, being illegal, arbitrary and violation of Article 14, 19(1)g and 21 of the Constit
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Andhra Pradesh High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.