Triveni Glass LTD vs. Union Of INDIA
Original PDF →WP/35902/2022HC Andhra PradeshGSTCNR APHC01058844202228 January 2025Bench: R RAGHUNANDAN RAO,MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM5 pages
For Petitioner: SRI LAKSHMI KUMARAN SRIDHARANFor Respondent: GP FOR COMMERCIAL TAX
No AI summary yet for this judgment.
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF JANUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R.RAGHUNANDAN RAO
AND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 35902 OF 2022
Between:
Triveni Glass Ltd, R- Kondagudem, Gowripatnam, Devarapali Mandal,
West Godavari, Andhra Pradesh- 534313
...Petitioner
AND
Union of India, Through The Secretary, Department of Revenue Ministry
of Finance North Block, New Delhi.
State of Andhra Pradesh, Through Chief Commissioner of State Tax
Commercial Taxes Department, Andhra Pradesh R.K. Spring Valley
Apartments, Bandar Road Eedupugallu, Vijayawada, Krishna District.
The Principal Commissioner of Central Tax, Guntur CGST
Commissionerate Andhra Pradesh, Guntur.
Joint Commissioner, Office of Commissioner of Central Tax, Guntur.
Commissioner of Central Tax and Customs, (Appeals) Guntur, Guntur.
...Respondents
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in
the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may
be pleased
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
a. To Declare that the provisions of Section 122(2)(b) of the GST Act
read with Section 74(1) of the GST Act are unconstitutional in terms
of Article 14 of the Constitution of India as being
arbitrary
to the
extent these provisions do not distinguish imposition of penalty
in
respect of discharge of GST Liability through ITC from imposition of
penalty in respect of discharge of GST Liability through cash
in the
same manner as proviso to Section 50(1) of the GST Act
|ro declare that Section 73(1) is also unconstitutional
in
terms
of
Article 14 of the Constitution of India as being arbitrary to the extent
these provisions do not distinguish imposition of penalty in respect of
discharge of GST Liability through ITC from imposition of penalty in
respect of discharge of GST Liability through cash
in
the same
manner as proviso to Section 50(1) of the GST Act
c. To issue a Writ, Order or Direction particularly one in the nature of
'WRIT OF MANDAMUS' setting aside the Impugned Order-in-Appeal
NO.GUN-GST-000-APP037-22-23 dated 20..07.2022 for the period of
August, 2017 to March, 2018, passed by Respondent No.5
to the
extent prejudicial to the interest of the Petitioner.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI LAKSHMI KUMARAN SRIDHARAN
Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR COMMERCIAL TAX
Counsel for the Respondents: SRI B V S CHALAPATHI
The Court made the following order:
;
.
fi
APHC010588442022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3508]
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF JANUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
/
/
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO
the honourable SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 35902/2022
Between:
Xriveni Glass Ltd
...PETITIONER
AND
Union Of India and Others
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.LAKSHMI KUMARAN
SRIDHARAN
...RESPONDENT{S)
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.B VS CHALAPATI RAO
2.GP FOR COMMERCIAL TAX
3.
The Court made the following order: (perHon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao)
In view of the
letter,
dated
24.01.2025,
addressed by the
learned
counsel for the petitioner to the Registrar (Judicial) of this Court, seeking to
withdraw
this
Writ
Petition,
the
present
Writ
Petition
is
dismissed
as
withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications,
if any,
shall stand
closed.
Sd/- M SRINIVAS
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
\
//TRUE COPY//
SECTIONTOFFICER
\
\
To,
1. One CC to Sri Lakshmi Kumaran Sridharan, Advocate [OPUC]
One CC to Sri B.V.S. Chalapathi, Advocate [OPUC]
^o^CCs to GP for Commercial Tax, High Court of Andhra
Pradesh.
Two CD Copies
2.
3.
4.
RAM
\
HIGH COURT
DATED:29/01/2025
WP.No.35902 of 2022 DISMISSING THE WP WITHOUT COSTS
Reproduced from the public record of the Andhra Pradesh High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.