Tirumala Balaji Marbles And Granites vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)

Original PDF →
WP/1200/2025HC Andhra PradeshGSTCNR APHC01002294202504 February 2025Bench: R RAGHUNANDAN RAO,HARINATH.N6 pages
For Petitioner: SRI ANIL KUMAR BEZAWADAFor Respondent: GP FOR COMMERCIAL TAX

No AI summary yet for this judgment.

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
is- IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R.RAGHUNANDAN RAO AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 1200 OF 2025 Between: Tirumala Balaji Marbles and Granites, Represented by Smt. Puna Devi 104-8-491/A, RS No. 98/1, Hukumpeta Gram Panchayat, Rajamahendravaram, East Godavari, Andhra Pradesh - 533 107. ...Petitioner AND The Assistant Commissioner (ST), Central Registration Unit, O/o The Chief Commissioner of State Tax, Door No. 12-468-4, Adjacent to NH- 16, Service Road, Kunchanapally, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh - 522 501. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Principal Secretary Revenue Department, A.P. Secretariat, Velegapudi. Union of India, Department of Revenue, Represented by its Secretarv (Revenue), North Block, New Delhi. 1. 2. 3. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ, direction or order quashing the proceedings of the 1"* Respondent in rejecting the GST Registration Application of the Petitioner in Form GST REG-05 dated 04.11.2024 on the ground that the authorized belong to Andhra Pradesh representative does not as being arbitrary, without jurisdiction unconstitutional, unreasonable, contrary to the provisions of the APGST Act, 2017 and violative of Article 13, 14 15, 19(1)(g) and 301 of the Constitution of India and consequently, direct the 1®‘ Respondent to grant the GST Registration to the Petitioner. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 .Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased stay the operation of the proceedings of the 1st Respondent in the Order rejecting the GST Registration application of the Petitioner in Form GST REG-05 dated 04.11.2024, in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI ANIL KUMAR BEZAWADA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR COMMERCIAL TAX Counsel for the Respondents: SRI PASALA PONNA RAO, DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA

The Court made the following order:

W.P.No.l 200/2025 APHC010022942025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Juri iction) [3488] WEDNE AY, THE FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 1200/2025 Between: ...PETITIONER Tirumala Balaji Marbles And Granites AND ...RESPONDENT(S) The Assistant Commissioner St and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.ANIL KUMAR BEZAWADA Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1.

GP FOR COMMERCIAL TAX

2.

The Court made the following Order: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao) Heard Sri Anil Bezawada, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Commercial Tax appearing for respondents 1 and 2 and learned Deputy Solicitor General appearing for respondent No.3. /

2 RRR.J & HN,J W.P.No.1200/2025 1 2, The petitioner sought registration under A.P. Goods and Services Tax Act, 2005 (for short 'the Act’) for its place of business situated in Rajamahendravaram. This application, dated 19.10.2024, was rejected by the 1®* respondent by an order dated 04.11.2024. The ground, given for such rejection, was that the applicant does not belong to Andhra Pradesh and the authorized representative, put forward by the petitioner, does not belong to the State of Andhra Pradesh. Aggrieved by the said order of rejection, the petitioner had approached this Court by way of the present writ petition.

3.

The learned Government Pleader for Commercial Tax, on instructions, submits that the registration was refused on the ground that there would be any amount of scope for tax evasion, as none of the responsible persons are from the State of Andhra Pradesh. -

4.

Though the apprehension of the respondents may not be misplaced, it would not mean that registration can be refused on a ground which is not available under the Statute or the Rules. There do not appear to be any restrj^l^n for persons outside the State to come into the State of Andhra Pradesh and seek registration under the APGST Act.

5.

Mere apprehension, however well founded, cannot deprive the petitioner of his right to carry on trade and business in the State of Andhra Pradesh. It is also necessary to notice that Article 19 of the Constitution of India, gxsnts every citizen of this Country, the right to set up and do business W.P.No. 1200/2025 anywhere in the country. In such circumstances, the order of rejection is clearly without any basis in law. Accordingly, this writ petition is allowed and the order of rejection dated 04.11.2024 is set aside. The respondents are directed to register the petitioner under the APGST Act. However, it would be open to the respondents to take such steps, as they deem fit, to monitor the returns of the petitioner and to verify the business activities of the petitioner, for ensuring that there will be no tax evasion. There shall be no order as to costs.

6.

As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. P. VINOD KUMAR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR CmON OFFICER //// SE To, r., The Assistant Commissioner (ST), Central Registration Unit, O/o The Chief Commissioner of State Tax, Door No. 12-468-4, Adjacent to NH- 16, Service Road, Kunchanapally, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh - 522 501. 2. The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, State of Andhra Pradesh, A.P. Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District.

3.

The Secretary (Revenue), Union of India, Department of Revenue, North Block, New Delhi.

4.

One CC to Sri Anil Kumar Bezawada, Advocate [OPUC]

5.

One CC to Sri Pasala Ponna Rao, Deputy Solicitor General of India [OPUC]

6.

Two CCs to GP for Commercial Tax, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]

7.

Two CD Copies RAM

HIGH COURT DATED:05/02/2025 iP S 26JUHa)25 ORDER WP.No.1200 of 2025 ALLOWING THE WP WITHOUT COSTS

Reproduced from the public record of the Andhra Pradesh High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.