Khaleel Bhai Famliy Restaurant vs. The Assistant Commissioner(St)
Original PDF →No AI summary yet for this judgment.
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
the Order in Form GST DRC-07 dated 24.08.2024, passed by the 2nd Respondent and levying tax under Section 74(1 O^ 'bf the CGST/APGST Act. 2017 and interest and penalty for the tax period’S2018-19 (April-2018 to March-2019) without authorisation, without DIN in the order, the Summary of the order in Form GST DRC-07 and the Summary of the Order and without Signature of the 1 Respondents in the Order, Summary' of the Order in Form GST DRC-07, dated 24.08.2024. as arbitrary', contrary to the provisions of the CGST/APGST Act. 2017, without establishing any fraud/misstatemen t and irregularities of the Petitioners the orders and summary of order as contemplated under Section 74(10) of the CGST/APGST Act 2017, which is not valid in the eye of law and as illegal, arbitrary, without juri iction, bias, frivolous, and in violation of Principles of Natural Justice and contrary to Article 14 of the Constitution of India, as null and void. nd St and 2 lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the Fligh Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the Order, dated 24,08.2024, the Summary of the Order in Form GST DRC-07, dated 24.08.2024 and Summary of the Order, dated 24.08.2024 passed by the 1 Respondent, for the tax period 2018-19, under CGST/APGST Act, 2017, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition, as otherwise, the Petitioner will be put to severe loss and hardship. St nd and 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI VENKATRAM REDDY MANTUR Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR COMMERCIAL TAX Counsel for the Respondents: SRI POSALA PONNA RAO DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA The Court made the following order:
APHC010085462025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Juri iction) [3508] TUE AY. THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 4609/2025 Between: Khaleel Bhai Famliy Restaurant ...PETITIONER AND The Assistant Commissionerst and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: ...RESPONDENT(S)
VENKATRAM REDDY MANTUR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR COMMERCIAL TAX
The Court made the following order: (perHon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao) The petitioner was served with an assessment order, under FORM GST DRC - 07. dated 24.08.2024. passed by the 2"^ respondent, under the Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 [for short “the GST Act”], for the period April 2018 to March 2019. This assessment order of the 2'^^ challenged by the petitioner in this writ petition. respondent has been 2 RRR, J & MRK, /' W.P.No.4609 of 2025 This assessment order is challenged by the petitioner, on various grounds, including the ground that the said proceedings did not contain a DIN
I number. Learned Government Pleader for Commercial Tax, on 3. instructions, submits that there is no DIN number on the impugned assessment order. The question of the effect of non-inclusion of DIN number on proceedings, under the G.S.T. Act, came to be considered by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Pradeep Goya! Vs. Union of India & Ors\
The Hon’ble Supreme Court, after noticing the provisions of the Act and the circular issued by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (herein referred to as “C.B.LC.’), had held that an order, which does not contain a DIN number would be non-esf and invalid. A Division Bench of this Court in the case of M/s. Cluster
Enterprises Us. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (ST)-2, Kadapa on the basis of the cirdular, dated 23.12.2019, bearing No. 128/47/2019-GST issued by the C.B.I.C., had held that non-mention of a DIN number would ' 2022 (63) G.S.T.L. 286 (SC) ^2024(88) G.S.T.L. 179 (A.P.)
3 RRR, J & MRK, J Deputy Commissioner, Special Circle, Visakhapatnam\ had also held^that non-mention of a DIN number would require the order to be set aside. In view of the aforesaid judgments and the circular issued by the C.B.I.C., the non-mention of a DIN number in the portal, requires the impugned order to be set aside. 6. in the order, which was uploaded
Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of, setting aside the impugned proceedings, dated 24.08.2024, issued by the 2'^^ respondent, with liberty to the 2'''^ respondent to conduct fresh assessment, after giving notice to the petitioner and assigning a DIN number to the said order. The period from the date of the impugned assessment order, till the date of receipt of this order shall be excluded for the purposes of limitation. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications if any, shall stand closed. 2024 (88) G.S.T.L. 303 (A.P.) A K.J.RAJA BASU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //// SECTION OFFICER To,
The Assistant Commissioner($T), O/o The Additional Commissioner of State Tax, Regional GST Audit and Enforcement (S)T, 2"'' Floor, Door No 27-6-106, Prakasam Road, Governorpet, Vijayawada. NTR District Andhra Pradesh - 520002
The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (ST), Penamaluru, Vijayawada-Ill Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh.
The Principal Secretary, (Commercial Taxes Department). State of Andhra Pradesh, A.P. Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh.
The Secretary, Union of India, Ministry of Finance, Nort oc , Delhi - 110 001
The Chairman of Finance,! New Delhi - 100 001. rnpi in 6 One CC to Sri Venkatram Reddy Mantur, Advocate [Uruu
One CC to Sri Pasala Ponna Rao, Deputy Solicitor General of India High Court of Andhra Pradesh Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs, Ministry Department of Revenue, North Block, Central Secretariat, [OPUC] 8 Two CCS to GP for Commercial Tax [OUT]
Two CD Copies / RAM
HIGH COURT DATED:25/02/2025 ORDER WP.No.4609 of 2025 =Sl 2 5 JUN 2025 )S rrwtSectiQjix^V DISPOSING OF THE WP WITHOUT COSTS
Reproduced from the public record of the Andhra Pradesh High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.