M/S Sri Krishna Enterprises vs. Assistant Commissioner (State Tax)

WP/5054/2025HC Andhra PradeshGSTCNR APHC01009344202504 March 2025Bench: R RAGHUNANDAN RAO,K MANMADHA RAO4 pages
For Petitioner: J.N VENKATA SURESH KUMARFor Respondent: GP FOR COMMERCIAL TAX
AI SummaryRemanded

Held

The Court held that the absence of a DIN number in the impugned order for cancellation of registration renders it invalid and non-est. This finding is based on the Supreme Court's decision in Pradeep Goyal Vs. Union of India & Ors, which held that orders without a DIN number are invalid. The Court also referred to its own Division Bench judgments in M/s. Cluster Enterprises Vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (ST)-2, Kadapa and Sai Manikanta Electrical Contractors Vs. The Deputy Commissioner, Special Circle, Visakhapatnam, which, following a CBIC circular dated 23.12.2019 (No.128/47/2019-GST), established that non-mention of a DIN number vitiates the proceedings. Consequently, the impugned order dated 13.12.2024 was set aside. The first respondent was granted liberty to initiate fresh proceedings after issuing a notice to the petitioner and assigning a DIN number to the subsequent order. No costs were awarded.

Facts

The petitioner, M/s Sri Krishna Enterprises, challenged an order for cancellation of registration (FORM GST REG-19) dated 13.12.2024, passed by the Assistant Commissioner State Tax, the first respondent. The petitioner contended that the impugned order lacked a Document Identification Number (DIN). The Government Pleader for Commercial Tax, on instructions, confirmed the absence of a DIN number on the order. The Court noted that the Supreme Court in Pradeep Goyal Vs. Union of India & Ors and Division Benches of the High Court in M/s. Cluster Enterprises Vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (ST)-2, Kadapa and Sai Manikanta Electrical Contractors Vs. The Deputy Commissioner, Special Circle, Visakhapatnam had previously held that orders lacking a DIN number are invalid.

Key Issues

1. Whether an order for cancellation of GST registration, which does not contain a Document Identification Number (DIN), is invalid and non-est in law, as per the provisions of the Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and relevant circulars? Petitioner's contention: The petitioner argued that the absence of a DIN number renders the impugned order invalid. They relied on the principle that official communications require proper identification. Respondent's contention: The respondent conceded that the impugned order did not contain a DIN number.

Sections Cited

FORM GST REG – 19

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

APHC010093442025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3525] WEDNESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 5054/2025 Between: M/s Sri Krishna Enterprises, ...PETITIONER AND Assistant Commissioner State Tax and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner:

1.

J.N VENKATA SURESH KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1.

GP FOR COMMERCIAL TAX The Court made the following Order: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao)

The petitioner was served with an order for cancellation of registration, in FORM GST REG – 19, dated 13.12.2024, passed by the 1st respondent under the Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [for short “the GST Act”]. The said order of the 1st respondent has been challenged by the petitioner in the present Writ Petition.

2 RRR,J & Dr.KMR,J W.P.No.5054 of 2025

2.

This order, in FORM GST REG – 19, is challenged by the petitioner, on various grounds, including the ground that the said proceedings did not contain a DIN number.

3.

Learned

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Andhra Pradesh High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.