M/S. Sona Residency vs. Assistant Commissioner (St)

Original PDF →
WP/10251/2025HC Andhra PradeshGSTCNR APHC01019661202522 April 2025Bench: R RAGHUNANDAN RAO,B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI7 pages
For Petitioner: SMT. K LIMAFor Respondent: GP FOR COMMERCIAL TAX

No AI summary yet for this judgment.

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
> IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) A AN®, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL -ov 9^ WEDNESDAY. TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE \0 PRESENT HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 10251 OF 2025 Between: M/s. Sona Residency, rep. by its Proprietor, Mr. Allu Varalakshmaiah, #7-30- 29/2, Main Road. Santhi Nivas Centre, Rajamahendravarann-533 101, East Godavari District ...PETITIONER AND 1. Assistant Commissioner (ST), Rajahmundry. 2. State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary to Government (CT), Finance Department, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 3 Union of India, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Government of India, Ministry of Finance. 3rd Floor, Jeevan Deep Building. Sansad Marg. New Delhi-110 001. ...RESPONDENTS under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed praying Petition that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate direction setting aside the DRC-07 dated 13.6.2022 passed writ or order or periods 2017-18 to 2021-22 vide Ref.No.ZH 370622OD48929 for the tax dated 13.06.2022 issued by the 1st Respondent and uploaded in the GST without there being signatures manually or with Digital common portal Signature Certificates as legally unenforceable and in any event declare the ■-w impugned order as unsustainable on merits in the light of contentions raised by the Petitioner. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings pursuant to the impugned order of the 1st Respondent dated 13.06.2022 for the tax period 2017-18 to 2021-22, pending disposal of the Writ Petition, as otherwise the Petitioner will be put to severe loss and hardship. Counsel for the Petitioner: SMT. K LIMA Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 & 2: GP FOR COMMERCIAL TAX Counsel for the Respondent No.3: DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA

The Court made the following: ORDER

APHCO'10196612025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Juri iction) [3535] WEDNE AY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R F?AGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 10251/2025 Between; M/s. Sona Residency, ...PETITIONER AND Assistant Commissioner St and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.KUMA Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1.

GP FOR COMMERCIAL TAX The Court made the following order: The petitioner herein, who is in the business of providing accommodation in hotels/inn/guest houses/club or camp site, was subjected to an assessment order, dated 13.06.2022, disallowing input tax credit of Rs.4,68,508/- and directing the petitioner to pay the said input tax credit, which has been disallowed, within ten days from the date of receipt of the Order. ...RESPONDENT(S) The petitioner has challenged the said assessment order, by way of the present V\lnt Petition. The petitioner has raised various grounds, on the merits of the case and also on the ground that the impugned order does not contain any signature of the 1®' respondent either manually or digitally.

2.

Learned Government Pleader for Commercial Tax, took up a primary objection that the Writ Petition is hit by latches as the impugned order had been passed on 13.06.2022, whereas the present Writ Petition came to be filed three years after the said impugned order. 3. 2 The petitioner, in her affidavit, has stated that she was unable to challenge the impugned order on account of the illness of her mother-in-law, who was diagnosed with cancer, and the fact that she had to attend to her mother-in-law at Visakhapatnam and was unable to look after her affairs for of Uttar Prades & Ors, in Civil Appeal No. 13806 of 2024, dated 04.12.2024. A Sections-160 & 169 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017, would not rectify such a defect. Following this Judgment, another Division Bench of this Court, in the case of M/s. M/s. SRS in W.P.No.5238 of 2024, following the aforesaid of the signature of the assessing assessment order invalid 19.03.2024, in Commissioner ST & ors, in two Judgments, had held that the absence order, would render the the assessment officer, on and set aside the said order. the aforesaid Judgments, the impugned assessment of the absence of the signature Following orders would have to of the assessing officer, on 10. be set aside on account the impugned assessment order. ins that the merits of the issue of whether for consideration. In the of this Writ Petition by However, the fact remains - be reversed or not remains open

11.

Input Tax Credit can circumstances, it setting aside the impugned order, dated 13 50Vo of the Input Tax it would be appropriate to dispose .06.2022, subject to the condition Credit which has been of the petitioner depositing ix weeks from today. the impugned order, within six disallowed, in the respondents to initiate of hearing given to Needless to say, it would be open to orders after due opportunity 12. fresh proceedings and pass the petitioner. is disposed of. There shall be no Accordingly, this Writ Petition is 13. order as to costs. miscellaneous applications, if any, Cfi/.A V’lJAYABABU ^ registrar SECTIO^^ OFFSCJER As a sequel, pending shall stand closed. //// assistant To, Assistant Commissioner (ST), Rajahmundry.

1.

The 2 The Principal Secretary to , Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. The Principal Secretary, Union of India finance 3rd Floor, Jeevan Deep Building 110001. 4. One CC to Smt. K Uma Advocate [OPUC] Government (CT), Finance Department, Government of India, Mini^ry of Sansad Marg, New Delhi-

^ P^sala Ponna Rao, Deputy Solicitor High Court of A.P. [OPUC] general of India; [^UT^’° Commercial Tax, High Court of Andhra Pradesh.

7.

Three CD Copies TF

HIGH COURT DATED:23/04/2025 ORDER WP.No.10251 of 2025 M 0 7 AUG 2025 ta DISPOSING OF THE W.P., WITHOUT COSTS

Reproduced from the public record of the Andhra Pradesh High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.