M/S. Vital Hatcheries (P) LTD vs. The State Of Andhra Pradesh
Held
The High Court, by referring to a common order passed by a Division Bench in W.P.No.29672 of 2023 & batch dated 26.06.2025, disposed of the present writ petition. The Division Bench had struck down G.O.Ms.No.7, dated 08.04.2022, finding that the power to fix different rates of duty for different categories of consumers had been struck down. Consequently, the fixation of different rates of duty for different categories identified by the government had to be set aside. However, the proviso to Section 3, fixing a minimum duty of 6 paise (Rs. 0.06) per unit, was upheld. The Court also upheld the amendment to Section 3 by Act 23 of 2024, granting the government power to fix duty rates between six paise and one rupee per unit. The amendments to Section 3 by Act 10 of 2021 and Act 23 of 2024, granting power to identify consumer categories for tariff fixing, were set aside. G.O.Ms.No.22, dated 23.10.2024, was also struck down, but G.O.Ms.No.277, dated 09.12.1994, remained in force. The government was entitled to collect duty at 6 paise per unit throughout the disputed period, and licensees were permitted to recover duty at 6 paise per unit from consumers.
Facts
M/s. Vital Hatcheries (P) Ltd. (Petitioner) filed a writ petition challenging G.O.M.S.No. 7, Energy (Power-III) Department, dated 08-04-2022, issued by the State of Andhra Pradesh (Respondent No. 1). This G.O. purportedly increased the Electricity Duty from Rs. 0.06 per unit to Rs. 1.00 per unit for commercial and industrial consumers. The petitioner argued this was an arbitrary and illegal exercise of power under Section 3(1) of the Andhra Pradesh Electricity Duty Act, 1939. The consequential action by APEPDCL (Respondent No. 2) in levying this enhanced duty through bills from April 2022, payable on March 1, 2023, and continuously thereafter, was also challenged. The petitioner sought to set aside the G.O. and the bills, and to refund or adjust excess duty paid since December 2024.
Key Issues
1. Whether the action of the 1st respondent in issuing G.O.M.S.No. 7, dated 08-04-2022, exorbitantly increasing the Electricity Duty from Rs. 0.06 to Rs. 1.00 per unit for commercial and industrial consumers, is arbitrary, illegal, unjust, unfair, unreasonable, excessive, and violative of Fundamental and Constitutional Rights, Principles of Natural Justice, the National Tariff Policy 2016, and the common order on Tariff for Retail Sale of Electricity for FY 2022-23 passed by the Andhra Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission, contrary to law. Petitioner's Contention: The G.O. represents a colourable exercise of power under Section 3(1) of the Andhra Pradesh Electricity Duty Act, 1939, and is contrary to various policies and principles. Revenue's Contention: Not recorded in the judgment excerpt provided.
Sections Cited
Section 3, Section 3A, Section 7
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
APHC010211812025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESHv^ AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JUNE \/ TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA^R^I DY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 10950 OF 2025 Between: M/s. Vital Hatcheries (P) Ltd, Sy.no. 73, Srirampuram, U.Kothapalli (M), Kakinada District, Rep. by its Managing Director K.Udaya fehaskar, S/o. K.Sanjeevayya Naidu Age 49 years, business, R/o. Ram^Tnayyapeta, Kakinada. Elec. S.C.No. 1452540916000277 L.T. Ill A, Industrial. ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Ene}^ Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District, Rep. by its Principal Secretary.
The Andhra Pradesh Eastern Power Distribution Corporation Limited, represented By its Chairman and Managing Director, Corporate Office, W''" Near Gurudwara, P and T colony, Seetammadhara, Visakhapatnam. 530013. 3. The Senior Accounts Officer, Operation Circle, APEPDCL, P.R. College grounds,( PO) Kakinada (PO) and District. ...Respondents Petition under Article of the Constitution of India praying that in the Circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Andhra Pradesh High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.