Escientia Advanced Sciences Private Limited vs. The State Of Ap
Held
The Court allowed the writ petition, holding that the issue was squarely covered by the Order of the Hon'ble Division Bench in W.P.No.29672 of 2023 and batch dated 26.06.2025. The Division Bench had struck down G.O.Ms.No.7 dated 08.04.2022. Consequently, the respondents were disentitled from levying electricity duty at the rate of one rupee per unit of sales. The Court directed that the present writ petition be allowed in terms of the Order passed by the Hon'ble Division Bench. The operative directions from the Division Bench's order, as referenced, included upholding the amendment to Section 3 granting power to fix duty rates between six paise and one rupee, setting aside amendments granting power to identify consumer categories for tariff fixing, upholding the proviso for a minimum duty of 6 paise in the absence of notification, striking down amendments to Section 7, striking down G.O.Ms.No.7 dated 08.04.2022 while allowing collection of duty at 6 paise per unit until modified, and keeping the exemption for agricultural consumers in force. The Division Bench also struck down G.O.Ms.No.22 dated 23.10.2024, while keeping G.O.Ms.No.277 dated 09.12.1994 in force.
Facts
The petitioner, Escientia Advanced Sciences Private Limited, filed a writ petition challenging the validity of G.O.Ms.No.7, Energy (Power-III) Department dated 08.04.2022. This Government Order increased the electricity duty from Rs.0.06 paise per unit to Rs.1.00 paise per unit on energy sales made to commercial and industrial consumers. The petitioner sought a direction to levy electricity duty only at the rate of Rs.0.06 paise per unit and to adjust any refundable amount in future consumption bills. The respondents are the State of Andhra Pradesh and the Eastern Power Distribution Company of Andhra Pradesh Ltd. The petitioner contended that the G.O. was illegal and arbitrary. The respondents placed on record a judgment from a Division Bench of the same High Court in W.P.No.29672 of 2023 and batch.
Key Issues
1. Whether G.O.Ms.No.7, Energy (Power-III) Department dated 08.04.2022, which increased the electricity duty on energy sales to commercial and industrial consumers from Rs.0.06 paise to Rs.1.00 per unit, is illegal, arbitrary, and contrary to law? Petitioner's Contention: The petitioner argued that the action of the respondents in issuing G.O.Ms.No.7 dated 08.04.2022, levying electricity duty at Rs.1.00 per unit on energy sales to commercial and industrial consumers, is illegal, arbitrary, and contrary to law. They sought to have the duty levied at the previous rate of Rs.0.06 paise per unit and for the refund of excess amounts paid. Respondents' Contention: The respondents did not present separate arguments but relied on the judgment of the Hon'ble Division Bench in W.P.No.29672 of 2023 and batch, which dealt with similar issues concerning electricity duty.
Sections Cited
Section 3, Section 3A, Section 7
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
APHC010373062025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 19101/2025 Between:
ESCIENTIA ADVANCED SCIENCES PRIVATE LIMITED, PLOT NO 11,11A,12 AND 12A,APSEZ, ATCHUTAPURAM, VISAKHAPATNAM, ANDHRA PRADESH, PIN-531011, REP.BY ITS PLANT HEAD,SRI. SANJAY KUMAR VAISHNAVA.
SERVICE CONNECTION NO.VSP1353. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, ENERGY DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
EASTERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY OF ANDHRA PRADESH LTD, REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR,
P AND T COLONY, SEETHAMMADHARA, VISAKHAPATNAM.
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
HANUMANTHA RAO BACHINA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
GP FOR ENERGY The Court made the following:
ORAL ORDER:
Heard Sri Hanumantha Rao Bachina, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner and Ms. Kothapalli Aishwarya Chowdary, learned counsel representing Sri V.V.Satish, learned Standing Cou
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Andhra Pradesh High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.