M/S. Super Traders vs. Deputy Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax - Ii
Original PDF →WP/9976/2023HC Andhra PradeshGSTCNR APHC01019322202329 July 2025Bench: R RAGHUNANDAN RAO,SUMATHI JAGADAM8 pages
For Petitioner: SRI J.N VENKATA SURESH KUMARFor Respondent: GP FOR COMMERCIAL TAX( REVENUE, CT-I)
No AI summary yet for this judgment.
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
V
^
APHC010193222023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JULY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO
AND
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 9976 OF 2023
Between:
M/s. Super Traders, Represented by its proprietor. - Sri khazi Mohammed Arif
17-8-172, Bapoojinagar Parigi Road
Hindupur, Anantapuram
District, AP,
PIN. -515201
...Petitioner
AND
1. Deputy Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax
II, Hindupur Circle, Srinidhi
complex.
First Floor D.L. Road, Hindupur - PIN.-515201
2. State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by us Secretary, Revenue (CT-I)
Department, Government Secretariat
Building Velagapudi, Amaravati
(M),
Guntur (District)AP, PIN. -522503
...Respondents
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be
pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction,
more in the nature of
Writ of Mandamus, setting aside the impugned common assessment orders
vide reference No.-ZD370223001677K dated 31-01-2023 and
remand
the
matter to the Assistant Commissioner of State Tax, Hindupur Circle, with a
direction to pass the consequential orders as per the law, after duly complying
with the principles of Natural Justice and the statutory procedures in full.
lA NO: 1 OF 2023
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated
in the affidavit filed
in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be
pleased
to
suspend
the
said common assessment
orders
vide
ref
No:
ZD370223001677K dated 31->01-2023 for the various reasons mentioned
in
detail in this affidavit filed in support of the writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI J.N VENKATA SURESH KUMAR
Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR COMMERCIAL TAX( REVENUE
CT-I)
The Court made the following order:
/
APHC01&193222023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3541]
WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JULY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 9976/2023
Between:
I.M/S. SUPER TRADERS, REPRESENTED BY
ITS PROPRIETOR.
-
SRI KHAZI MOHAMMED ARIF
17-8-172, BAPOOJINAGAR PARIGI
ROAD HINDUPUR, ANANTAPURAM DISTRICT, AP,
PIN.-515201
...PETITIONER
AND
1. DEPUTY
ASSISTANT
COMMISSIONER
OF
STATE
TAX
II,
FIRST
FLOOR
D.L.
HINDUPUR
CIRCLE,
SRINIDHI
COMPLEX,
ROAD, HINDUPUR-PIN.-515201
2.STATE
OF
ANDHRA
PRADESH,
REPRESENTED
BY
US
SECRETARY,
REVENUE
(CT-I)
DEPARTMENT,
GOVERNMENT
SECRETARIAT BUILDING VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI (M), GUNTUR
(DISTRICT)AP, PIN. -522503
...RESPONDENT{S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the
circumstances stated
in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be
pleased topleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction,
more in the
nature of Writ of Mandamus, setting aside the impugned common assessment
orders vide reference No.-ZD370223001677K dated 31-01-2023 and remand
the matter to the Assistant Commissioner of State Tax, Hindupur Circle, with a
direction to pass the consequential orders as per the law, after duly complying
with the principles of Natural Justice and the statutory procedures in full, and
to pass
2
•U
RRR, J&JS,J
W.P.No.9976 of 2023
lA NO: 1 OF 2023
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated
in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased
pleased
to suspend
the said common assessment orders
vide
ref
No'
ZD370223001677K dated 31-01-2023 for the various reasons mentioned in
detail in this affidavit filed in support of the writ petition and to pass such
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.J.N VENKATA SURESH KUMAR
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR COMMERCIAL TAX
3
RRR, J&JS,J
W.P.No.9976of2023
The Court made the following order: (perHon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao)
Heard
Sri
J.
N. Venkata Suresh
Kumar,
learned
petitioner
and
the
learned
Government
Pleader
for
Commercial
appearing for the respondents.
counsel
for
the
Tax,
2.
The
petitioner was served with
a show-cause
notice,
dated
13.12.2022, passed by the 1®‘ respondent, under the Goods and Service Tax
Act, 2017
[for short “the GST Act”]. This show-cause
notice
of
the
1
respondent has been challenged by the petitioner in this writ petition.
St
3.
This show-cause notice is challenged by the petitioner,
grounds, including the ground that the said proceedings did not contain a DIN
number.
on various
4.
Learned
Government
Pleader
for
Commercial
instructions, submits that there is no DIN number on the impugned show-
cause notice.
Tax,
on
5.
The question of the effect of non-inclusion of DIN number on
proceedings, under the G.S.T. Act, came to be considered by the Hon’ble
Supreme Court in the case of Pradeep Goya! Vs. Union of India & Ors\
The Hon ble Supreme Court, after noticing the provisions of the Act and the
circular issued by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (herein
2022 (63) G.S.T.L. 286 (SC)
4
RRR, J &JS,J
W.P.No.9976of2023
referred to as "C.B.I.C.”), had held that an order, which does not contain a DIN
number would be non-est and invalid.
6.
A
Division
Bench
of
this
Court
in
the
case
of
M/s.
Cluster
Enterprises Vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (ST)-2, Kadapa
on
the basis
of the circular, dated 23.12.2019, bearing No. 128/47/2019-GST,
issued by the C.B.I.C., had held that non-mention of a DIN number would
mitigate against the validity of such proceedings. Another Division Bench of
this Court
in the case
of Sai Manikanta Electrical Contractors
Vs.
The
Deputy Commissioner, Special Circle, Visakhapatnam^, had also held that
non-mention of a DIN number would require the order to be set aside.
7.
In view of the aforesaid judgments and the circular issued by the
C.B.I.C., the non-mention of a DIN number in the order, which was uploaded
in the portal, requires the impugned order to be set aside.
Accordingly, this Writ Petition
is disposed
of, setting
aside
the
impugned proceedings, dated 13.12.2022, issued by the 1®‘ respondent, with
liberty to the 1®‘ respondent to initiate fresh proceedings, after giving notice to
the petitioner and assigning a DIN number to the said order. The period from
the date of the impugned show-cause notice,
till the date of receipt of this
8.
order shall be excluded for the purposes of limitation. There shall be no order
as to costs.
^ 2024 (88) G.S.T.L. 179 (A.P.)
^ 2024 (8,8|G.5=.T.L. 303 (A.P.)
5
RRR, J&JS,J
W.P.No.9976of2023
As a sequel, pending miscellaneous
applications,
if any,
shall stand
closed.
Sd/- U SRIDEVI
DEPUTY REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
1. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax
II, Hindupur Circle,
Srinidhi complex.
First Floor D.L. Road,
Hindupur - PIN. -515201
2. The Secretary, State of Andhra Pradesh,
Revenue (CT-I) Department,
Government
Secretariat
Building
Velagapudi,
Amaravati
(M),
Guntur
(District)AP, PIN. -522503
3. One CC to SRI. J.N VENKATA SURESH KUMAR, Advocate [OPUC]
4. Two CCs to' GP FOR COMMERCIAL TAX, High Court of Andhra Pradesh
[OUT]
5. Two CD Copies
nm
■
V' =
HIGH COURT
DATED:30/07/2025
WP NO. 9976 OF 2023 DISPOSING OF THE WP WITHOUT COSTS
Reproduced from the public record of the Andhra Pradesh High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.