M/S Bismillah Iron Merchants vs. The State Of Andhra Pradesh

Original PDF →
WP/20847/2025HC Andhra PradeshGSTCNR APHC01040714202505 August 2025Bench: R RAGHUNANDAN RAO,T.C.D.SEKHAR6 pages
For Petitioner: SYED KHADER MASTANFor Respondent: GP FOR COMMERCIAL TAX

No AI summary yet for this judgment.

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
APHC010407142025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3529] WEDNESDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 20847/2025 Between: 1. M/S BISMILLAH IRON MERCHANTS,, DOOR NO. 16-9-26/1, WARD NO.26, OLD GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. REP BY ITS SOLE PROPRIETRIX, SHAIK SHAHIN,W/O. DAWOOD, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O DOOR NO. 18-5-39, AHAMAD NAGAR, 1ST LINE, CHINNA BAZAR, GUNTUR, DISTRICT GUNTUR. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, REVENUE (COMMERCIAL TAX) DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OFANDHRA PRADESH, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI,AMARAVATI 2. THE JOINT COMMISSIONER ST, GUNTUR-LL DIVISION, GUNTUR. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, STATE TAX, PEDAKAKANI CIRCLE, GUNTUR-I DIVISION. 4. THE DEPUTY ASSISTANT COMMISSIONERSTLL, BAPATLA CIRCLE. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be 2 RRR,J & TCDS,J W.P.NO.20847 OF 2025 pleased topleased to issue a writ or writs or order or orders one more particularly in the nature of Writ of Certiorari to call for records pertaining to 3rd Respondent's penalty order dated 20/06/2025 in Form GST DRC-07 in GSTIN. 37EAWPS7199E1ZK for the tax period 2018-19, show cause notice for the tax period 2018-19 in FORM GST DRC-01 dated 11/02/2025 in DIN3712022520475 penalty order is without DIN and quash the same and be pleased to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to suspend the operation of the 3rd Respondent’s penalty order dated 20/06/2025 in Form GST DRC-07 in GSTIN. 37EAWPS7199E1ZK for the tax period 2018-19 passed against the Petitioner and be please to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SYED KHADER MASTAN Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR COMMERCIAL TAX The Court made the following: 3 RRR,J & TCDS,J W.P.NO.20847 OF 2025 The Court made the following Order: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao) The petitioner was served with an assessment order, in FORM GST DRC – 07, dated 20.06.2025, passed by the 3rd respondent, under the Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [for short “the GST Act”] for the tax period 2018-19. This assessment order of the 3rd respondent has been challenged by the petitioner in this Writ Petition. 2. This assessment order, in FORM GST DRC – 07, is challenged by the petitioner, on various grounds, including the ground that, the said proceedings did not contain a DIN number. 3. Learned Government Pleader for Commercial Tax, on instructions, submits that there is no DIN number on the impugned

assessment order.

4.

The question of the effect of non-inclusion of DIN number on proceedings, under the G.S.T. Act, came to be considered by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Pradeep Goyal Vs. Union of India & Ors1. The Hon’ble Supreme Court, after noticing the provisions of the Act and the circular issued by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (herein referred to as “C.B.I.C.”), had held that an order, which does not contain a DIN number would be non-est and invalid.

1 2022 (63) G.S.T.L. 286 (SC)

W.P.NO.20847 OF 2025

5.

A Division Bench of this Court in the case of M/s. Cluster Enterprises Vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (ST)-2, Kadapa 2, on the basis of the circular, dated 23.12.2019, bearing No.128/47/2019-GST, issued by the C.B.I.C., had held that non-mention of a DIN number would non-mention of a DIN number would require the order to be set aside.

6.

In view of the aforesaid judgments and the circular issued by the C.B.I.C., the non-mention of a DIN number in the order, which was uploaded in the portal, requires the impugned order to be set aside.

7.

Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of, setting aside the impugned proceedings, dated 20.06.2025, issued by the 3rd respondent, with a liberty to the 3rd respondent to conduct fresh assessment, after giving a notice to the petitioner and assigning a DIN number to the said order. The period from the date of the impugned assessment order, till the date of receipt of this order shall be excluded for the purposes of limitation. There shall be no order as to costs.

2 2024 (88) G.S.T.L. 179 (A.P.) 3 2024 (88) G.S.T.L. 303 (A.P.)

W.P.NO.20847 OF 2025

As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J

_____________________ T.C.D.SEKHAR, J

Date:06.08.2025 LSP W.P.NO.20847 OF 2025 50

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO

AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR

WRIT PETITION No:20847 of 2025 (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao)

06.08.

2025

LSP

Reproduced from the public record of the Andhra Pradesh High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.