M/S. Edifice (Bharat) Private Limited vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)
Original PDF →WP/21373/2025HC Andhra PradeshGSTCNR APHC01041701202512 August 2025Bench: R RAGHUNANDAN RAO,T.C.D.SEKHAR7 pages
For Petitioner: SRI G NARENDRA CHETTYFor Respondent: GP FOR COMMERCIAL TAX
No AI summary yet for this judgment.
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
APHC010417012025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
V
Or
o
O
i
WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF AUGUS\-ii>^^
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
Ak
O
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R.RAGHUNANDAN RAO
AND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR
WRIT PETITION NO: 21373 OF 2025
Between:
M/s.
Edifice
(Bharat)
Private
Limited,
22/108,
Nagalakatta
Street,
Jammalamadugu,
YSR
District-
516434,
Andhra
Pradesh,
Rep.
by
its
Director, D. Suresh Babu.
...Petitioner
AND
1.
The
Assistant Commissioner
ST,
Proddatur
II
Circle,
D.
No.
22/586,
Rameswaram
Road,
Vasanthapeta,
Proddatur,
Kadapa
District-516164
,
Andhra Pradesh.
2. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by the
Principal Secretary to the
Government,
Revenue
(CT)
Department,
A.P.
Secretariat
Buildings,
Velagapudi, Guntur District, Andhra
Pradesh.
3. The Union of India, Through Secretary,
Ministry of Finance, Department of
Revenue
North Block, New Delhi- 110001.
...Respondents
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the
circumstances stated
in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be
pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly in
the nature of MANDAMUS declaring that the impugned Assessment, Penalty
and
Interest Order,
in
Form GST DRC-07 Summary
of the
Order,
vide
Reference No.
ZD3705250434386, dated 29-05-2025, r.w. Annexure to DRC
>
07, vide GSTIN 37AAECE1023G1Z4, dated 29-05-2025,
passed by the First
Respondent, u/S. 74(9) of the IGST, CGST
and SGST Acts, 2017, for the
F.Y. 2022-23, wherein the
Annexure to DRC 07 does not contain DIN, and
.
the Summary
of the Order in Form DRC 07 which was uploaded in the Portal
does not contain either physical or digital signature, is invalid, non-est deemed
to have never been issued, contrary to law and illegal and even on merits not
sustainable, and consequently set aside the same.
lA NO: 1 OF 2025
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated
in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to
grant stay of all further proceedings, including collection of tax,
interest and
penalty pursuant to the impugned Assessment*
Penalty and Interest Order,
in Form GST DRC-07 i.e., “Summary
of
the
Order", vide
Reference
No.
ZD3705250434386,
dated
29-05-2025,
r.w.
“Annexure
to DRC
07”,
vide
GSTIN:
37AAECE1023G1Z4,
dated
29-05-2025,
passed
by
the
First
Respondent, u/S. 74(9) of the IGST, CGST & SGST Acts, 2017, for the F.Y.
2022-23.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI G NARENDRA CHETTY
Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR COMMERCIAL TAX
The Court made the following order:
/
APHC010417P12025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3529]
WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR
WRIT PETITION NO: 21373/2025
Between:
1.M/S.
EDIFICE
(BHARAT)
PRIVATE
LIMITED,,
22/108,
NAGALAKATTA STREET, JAMMALAMADUGU, YSR
DISTRICT-
516434, ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS
DIRECTOR, D- SURESH
BABU.
...PETITIONER
AND
1.THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER ST, PRODDATUR
II CIRCLE, D.
VASANTHAPETA,
NO.
22/586,
RAMESWARAM
ROAD
PRODDATUR, KADAPA DISTRICT 516164, ANDHRA PRADESH.
PRINCIPAL
REVENUE
(CT)
BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI,
2.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY THE
SECRETARY
TO
THE
GOVERNMENT,
DEPARTMENT,
A.P. SECRETARIAT
GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA
PRADESH.
3.THE UNION OF
INDIA, THROUGH SECRETARY
FINANCE, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
DELHI- 110001.
MINISTRY OF
NORTH BLOCK, NEW
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be
pleased topleased to issue an
particularly in the
nature
of
appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more
MANDAMUS declaring that the impugned
I
^ i
2
Assessment, Penalty and Interest Order, in Form GST DRC-07 Summary of
the Order, vide Reference No.
ZD3705250434386, dated 29-05-2025,
r.w.
Annexure to DRC
07, vide GSTIN 37AAECE1023G1Z4, dated 29-05-2025,
passed by the First Respondent, u/S. 74(9) of the IGST, CGST
and SGST
Acts, 2017, for the F.Y. 2022-23, wherein the
Annexure to DRC 07 does not
contain DIN, and the Summary
of the Order in Form DRC 07 which was
uploaded in the Portal
does not contain either physical or digital signature, is
invalid,
non-est deemed to have never been issued, contrary to law and
illegal and even on merits not sustainable, and consequently
set aside the
same
lA NO: 1 OF 2025
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated
in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased
pleased to grant
stay of all further proceedings, including collection of tax,
interest and penalty pursuant to the impugned Assessment,
Penalty and
Interest Order, in Form GST DRC-07 i.e.,
“Summary
of
the
Order",
vide
Reference
No.
DRC
07”, vide GSTIN; 37AAECE1023G1Z4, dated 29-05-2025,
passed by
the First Respondent, u/S. 74(9) of the IGST, CGST
& SGST Acts, 2017, for
the F.Y. 2022-23
ZD3705250434386, dated 29-05-2025, r.w. “Annexure to
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.G NARENDRA CHETTY
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR COMMERCIAL TAX
3
The Court made the following Order: (perHon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao)
The petitioner was served with the summary of the Order, in Form
GST DRC-07 and the Annexure to DRC-07, dated 29.05.2025 passed by the
respondent, under the Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 [for short “the
GST
Act”] for the period 2022-23. The summary of the
Order and
the
Annexure to DRC-07 of the
1®^ respondent has been challenged
by the
petitioner in this Writ Petition.
2.
The summary of the Order and the Annexure to DR-07, dated
29.05.2025, are challenged by the petitioner, on various grounds, including
the ground that the said proceedings did not contain a DIN number.
3.
Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Commercial Tax for
the respondents, on instructions, submits that there is no DIN number on the
impugned summary of the Order and the Annexure to DRC-07.
4.
The question of the effect of non-inclusion of DIN number on
proceedings, under the G.S.T. Act, came to be considered by the Hon’ble
Supreme Court in the case of Pradeep Goyal Vs. Union of India & Ors\
The Hon’ble Supreme Court, after noticing the provisions of the Act and the
circular issued by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (herein
referred to as “C.B.I.C.”), had held that an order, which does not contain a DIN
number would be invalid.
A
Division Bench
of this Court
in the case
of M/s.
Cluster
Enterprises Vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (ST)-2, Kadapa
on
the basis of the circular, dated 23.12.2019, bearing No. 128/47/2019-GST,
issued by the C.B.I.C., had held that non-mention of a DIN number would
mitigate against the validity of such proceedings.
Another Division Bench of
this Court in the case of Sai Manikanta Electricai Contractors
Vs.
The
5.
^ 2022 (63) G.S.T.L. 286 (SC)
' 2024 (88) G.S.T.L. 179 (A.P.)
4
Deputy Commissioner, Special Circle, Visakhapatnam^, had also held that
non-mention of a DIN number would require the order to be set aside.
In view of the aforesaid judgments and the circular issued by the
C.B.I.C., the non-mention of a DIN number in this show-cause notice, which
was uploaded in the portal, requires this show-cause notice to be set aside.
6.
Accordingly, this Writ Petition
is disposed of setting
aside
the
summary of the Order, in Form GST DRC-07 and the Annexure to DRC-07,
dated
29.05.2025
passed
by
the
respondent,
with
liberty
to
the
1
respondent to conduct fresh assessment, after giving notice to the petitioner
and assigning a DIN number to the said impugned orders. The period from the
date of these Orders, till the date of receipt of this Order shall be excluded for
the purposes of limitation. There shall be no order as to costs.
7.
St
As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications,
if any,
shall
stand closed.
3rd 2024 (88) G.S.T.L. 303 (A.P.)
Sd/- U SRIDEVl
deputy REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
II Circle, D. No. 22/586,
Kadapa
District
ST, Proddatur
Road,
Vasanthapeta,
Proddatur
1. The Assistant Commissioner
Rameswaram
516164, Andhra Pradesh.
Government, Revenue (CT) Department,
.Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Guntur
2. The Principal Secretary to the
State of Andhra Pradesh, A.P
District, Andhra Pradesh.
Department of
of India,
Ministry of Finance
3. The Secretary, Union
North Block, New Delhi- 110001.
Narendra Chetty, Advocate [OPUC]
Revenue
4. OneCCtoSriG
CCs to GP for Commercial Tax, High Court of Andhra Pradesh
5. Two
[OUT]
6. Two CD Copies
RAM
HIGH COURT
DATED:13/08/2025
WP.NO. 21373 OF 2025 g( 0 <l NOV 2025 Ssl DISPOSING OF THE WP WITHOUT COSTS
Reproduced from the public record of the Andhra Pradesh High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.