Viswanadhapalli Ramprasad vs. The State Of Andhra Pradesh

Original PDF →
WP/956/2022HC Andhra PradeshGSTCNR APHC01052836202106 October 2025Bench: V.SUJATHA4 pages
For Petitioner: K L N SWAMYFor Respondent: GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING, GP FOR REVENUE (AP), GP FOR IRRIGATION COMM AREA DEV

No AI summary yet for this judgment.

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
APHC010528362021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] TUESDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 956/2022 Between: 1. VISWANADHAPALLI RAMPRASAD, , S/O. NARASIMHA MURTHY, AGED MAJOR, OCC CONTRACTOR,DOOR NO.1-77, MAIN ROAD, NEAR RAMALAYAM, GANGADUPALEM (V),ELAMANCHILI (M), W.G. DIST., ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPLE SECRETARY, IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT,SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DIST., 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPLE SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 3. THE ENGINEER IN CHIEF, IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DIST., 4. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, WEST GODAVARI DIST., AT ELURU 5. THE SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER, IRRIGATION CIRCLE, ELURU, 6. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, , DRINAGE DIVISION, BHIMAVARAM. 7. THE DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, DRINAGE SUB DIVISION, PALAKOLLU. 8. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, GUMULURU Page 2 of 4 SECTION,PALAKOLLU. 9. THE PAY AND ACCOUNTS OFFICER, WEST GODAVARI DIST., ELURU., ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue order or orders, direction or directions, Writ or Writs particularly one in the nature Writ of Mandamous or any appropriate writ declare the action of the respondents in not paying the bills for execution of works vide Agreement No.100/2020-21, dtd.26-03-21 awarded by the 6th Respondent to the petitioner for value of Rs.9,73,880/- with 12persent GST and interest till to day from the date of completion of respective works as illegal, arbitrary violation of principles of natural justice and violative of Article 14, 16, 21 of the Constitution of India, consequently direct the respondents to release the bills for the above complited works immediately with 12 persent GST and interest and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents to release the amount of Rs.9,73,880/- towards payment of above final bill for the contract works under taken by the petitioner long back, pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K L N SWAMY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING 2. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 3. GP FOR IRRIGATION COMM AREA DEV The Court made the following: Page 3 of 4 HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION No.956 of 2022

ORDER:

The present Writ Petition came to be filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:- “….to issue order or orders, direction or directions, Writ or Writs particularly one in the nature Writ of Mandamous or any appropriate writ declare the action of the respondents in not paying the bills for execution of works vide Agreement No.100/2020-21, dtd.26-03-21 awarded by the 6th Respondent to the petitioner for value of Rs.9,73,880/- with 12persent GST and interest till to day from the date of completion of respective works as illegal, arbitrary violation of principles of natural justice and violative of Article 14, 16, 21 of the Constitution of India, consequently direct the respondents to release the bills for the above complited works immediately with 12 persent GST and interest and to pass…”

2.

Today when the writ petition came up for hearing, Ms. K. Indu, learned counsel representing Mr. K.L.N.Swamy, learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that as the amounts payable to the petitioner have already been paid pending the writ petition, no further orders are required in the present writ petition.

3.

Recording the same, the Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending, if any, shall also stand closed.

_______________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA Date :07.10.2025 TVN

108

THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE V.SUJATHA

WRIT PETITION No.956 OF 2022

Date: 07.10.2025 TVN

Reproduced from the public record of the Andhra Pradesh High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.