Katragadda Siva Ramakrishna vs. The State Of Andhra Pradesh

Original PDF →
WP/11624/2022HC Andhra PradeshGSTCNR APHC01019501202207 October 2025Bench: V.SUJATHA4 pages
For Petitioner: K L N SWAMYFor Respondent: GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING, GP FOR IRRIGATION COMM AREA DEV

No AI summary yet for this judgment.

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
APHC010195012022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] WEDNESDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 11624/2022 Between: 1. KATRAGADDA SIVA RAMAKRISHNA,, S/O K.SAMBASIVA RAO, AGED 49 YEARS, OCC - CIVIL CONTRACTOR R/O. H. NO.11-18, VIJAYA SAI RESIDENCY, CHENCHUPETA, TENALI, GUNTUR DIST. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPLE SECRETARY, IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DIST., 2. THE PRINCIPLE SECRTARY, FINANCE AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT, THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH 2ND BLOCK, 1ST FLOOR, ROOM NO.287, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DIST., 3. THE ENGINEER IN CHIEF, IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DIST., 4. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT AT ELURU 5. THE SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER, IRRIGATION CIRCLE, WEST GODAVARI, ELURU. 6. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, DRINAGE DIVISION,BHIMAVARAM, WEST GODAVARI DIST., 7. THE PAY AND ACCOUNTS OFFICER, WEST GODAVARI DIST., 2 VS,J W.P.No.11624 of 2022 ELURU. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue order or orders, direction or directions, Writ or Writs particularly one in the nature Writ of Mandamous or any appropriate writ declare the action of the respondents in not paying the bills for execution of works vide (1) Agreement No. 90/2020-21 Dt.23-03-2021, (2) Agreement No. 89/2020-21 Dt.17-02- 2021 and (3) Agreement No. 91/2020-21 Dt.25-03-2021 awarded by 6th respondent a n d worth of Rs.15,39,392/- to the petitioner with 12percent GST and interest till to day from the date of completion of respective works as illegal, arbitrary violation of principles of natural justice and violative of Article 14, 16, 21 of the Constitution of India, consequently direct the respondents to release the bills for the above complited works immediately with 12percent GST and interest and to and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents to release the amount of Rs.15,39,392/- towards payment of above final bills for the contract works under taken by the petitioner long back, pending disposal of main WP No. of 2022 and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K L N SWAMY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING 2. GP FOR IRRIGATION COMM AREA DEV The Court made the following: 3 VS,J W.P.No.11624 of 2022 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 11624/2022

ORDER: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:- “….to issue order or orders, direction or directions, Writ or Writs particularly one in the nature Writ of Mandamous or any appropriate writ declare the action of the respondents in not paying the bills for execution of works vide (1) Agreement No.90/2020-21 Dt.23.03.2021, (2)Agreement No.89/2020-21 Dt.17.02.2021 and (3) Agreement No.91/2020-21 Dt 25.03.2021 awarded by 6th respondent and worth of Rs.15,39,392/- to the petitioner with 12% GST and interest till today from the date of completion of respective works as illegal, arbitrary violation of principles of natural justice and violative of Article 14, 16, 21 of the Constitution of India consequently direct the respondents to release the bills for the above completed works immediately with 12% GST and interest and to and to pass such other order or orders…”

2.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the respondents.

3.

At the time of hearing, Ms.K.Indu, learned counsel representing Sri K.L.N.Swamy, learned counsel for the petitioner stated that, pending the writ petition, the respondents have paid the amounts due to the petitioner. Therefore, requested this Court to close the writ petition.

4.

Recording the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed.

__________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA Dated 08.10.2025 JLV

4 VS,J W.P.No.11624 of 2022

216 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA

WRIT PETITION NO: 11624/2022

Dated 08.10.2025 JLV

Reproduced from the public record of the Andhra Pradesh High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.