Sajid Ahammed vs. J. Prasanth
Original PDF →Facts
The Revision Petitioner filed a Civil Revision Petition challenging an order attaching his salary. The Petitioner had died during the pendency of the petition.
Held
The Court noted that the Revision Petitioner had passed away. Consequently, the proceedings in the Civil Revision Petition were abated.
Key Issues
Whether the Civil Revision Petition abates due to the death of the Revision Petitioner.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
The Court made the following ORAL ORDER: Sri M. Mehdi Hussain, Ld. Counsel appearing online for the Revision Petitioner submits that the present C.R.P is filed challenging the Order dated 05.10.2024 in E.P.No.2 of 2024 in O.S.No.92 of 2017 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Hindupur to stay the impunged Order which is to the effect that the salary of the Revision Petitioner had been attached and this Order has been challenged in the present C.R.P. Ld. Counsel appearing on beahlf of Revision Petitioner submits that the Petitioner, against whom the attachment order had been passed, had died and therefore the present proceedings got abated.
In this view of the above matter, this Civil Revision Petition is closed as having been abated due to the death of the Revision Petitioner. No order as to costs.
Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. K J RAJA BABU assistant registrar //// SECTION OFFICER District. To, Ananthapuram Division), Hindupur in Advocate [OPUC] The Civil Judge (Senior 1 CC to Sri M.Mehdi Hussain
One
One CC to Ayesha Azma.S Advocate [OPUC]
Two CD Copies GPC vna
-0^ ''i3 HIGH COURT DATED: 15/10/2025 ORDER CRP NO. 1382 OF 2025 CLOSING THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION WITHOUT COSTS
Reproduced from the public record of the Andhra Pradesh High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.