Subash Chandra Mohanty vs. State Of Odisha
Held
The Court noted that the State Government has issued revised guidelines on December 10, 2018, to address the issue of works contracts entered into before July 1, 2017, but executed thereafter. These guidelines provide a detailed procedure for calculating the GST-inclusive work value for the balance work. Specifically, point 3(vii) of the revised guidelines states that if the revised GST-inclusive work value for the balance work is more than the original agreement work value for the balance work, the works contractor is to be reimbursed for the excess amount. The Court directed the petitioner to make a comprehensive representation before the appropriate authority within four weeks, ventilating their grievance. The authority is to consider and dispose of this representation in light of the aforesaid revised guidelines dated December 10, 2018, expeditiously, preferably by February 29, 2020. The Court also stated that if the petitioner is aggrieved by the authority's decision, they can challenge it. No coercive action is to be taken against the petitioner until February 29, 2020. The writ petition was disposed of accordingly.
Facts
The petitioner, a works contractor, filed a writ petition challenging the State's action of not reimbursing the differential tax amount arising from the transition from Value Added Tax (VAT) to Goods and Services Tax (GST) effective from July 1, 2017. The petitioner's grievance was that they were required to pay GST on works contracts entered into before the GST regime, which was not originally envisaged. The State submitted revised guidelines issued by the Finance Department on December 10, 2018, superseding earlier guidelines from December 7, 2017. These revised guidelines addressed the issue of works contracts tendered before July 1, 2017, but executed partly or wholly after that date.
Key Issues
1. Whether the petitioner is entitled to reimbursement of the differential tax amount arising from the change in tax regime from VAT to GST for works contracts entered into prior to July 1, 2017, but executed thereafter? The petitioner argued that they are facing difficulties due to the change in tax regime and are required to pay GST on contracts where it was not initially contemplated. They seek reimbursement for this additional tax burden. The revenue, through the Additional Government Advocate, submitted that revised guidelines have been issued by the Government of Odisha, Finance Department, vide Office Memorandum No. FIN-CTI-TAX-0045-2017/38535/F dated December 10, 2018. These guidelines provide a procedure for determining the GST-inclusive work value for the balance work executed after GST implementation and stipulate reimbursement if the revised value exceeds the original agreement value.
Sections Cited
Section 129
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
10.12.2019
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
By way of this writ petition, petitioner has challenged the action of the opposite parties in not reimbursing the differential tax amount arising out of change in tax regime from Value Added Tax (VAT) to Goods and Service Tax (GST) with effect from 01.07.2017. Batch of writ petitions are being filed on this issue. The main issue involved in such matters is that the difficulty faced by the contractors due to change in the regime regarding works contract under GST. The grievance of the petitioner is that in view of the introduction of the GST, petitioner is required to pay tax which was not envisaged while entering into the agreement.
Learned Addl. Government Advocate submits that the Government has now come out with a revised guidelines in this respect in supersession of the guidelines issued vide Finance Department letter dated 07.12.2017. He has filed an Additional Counter Affidavit of O.P.- authority in similar cases annexing the revised guidelines relating to works contract under GST issued by the Government of Odisha, Finance Department vide Office memora
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Orissa High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.