M/S.Paradeep Phosphates LTD. vs. Asst. Commissioner, CGST And Central Excise
Held
The Court held that an efficacious statutory remedy under Section 107 of the CGST Act was available to the petitioner. Therefore, the writ petition was not the appropriate forum at this stage.
Facts
The petitioner sought a direction to set aside an order rejecting their refund of unutilized Input Tax Credit (ITC) due to an inverted duty structure. The petitioner argued that the rejection order was non-speaking and passed without an opportunity for hearing, contrary to law and a relevant circular.
Key Issues
Whether a writ petition is maintainable when an alternative statutory remedy exists for challenging a refund rejection order. Whether the impugned order was passed without due process and consideration of the petitioner's reply.
Sections Cited
Section 107
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
02 03.09.2020
Heard Mr.Jnanesh Mohanty, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.R.S.Chimanka, learned Senior Standing Counsel for CGST & Central Excise through Video Conferencing mode.
The petitioner-Company in this writ petition prays for a direction to set aside the order passed by the Assistant Commissioner, CGST and Central Excise, Cuttack Division (OP No.1) in rejecting the refund of unutilized ITC to the petitioner-Company accumulated taking into account of inverted duty structure. The petitioner-Company further prays for a direction to the opposite party No.1 to pass a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law taking into consideration the Circular No.59/33/2018-GST dated 04.09.2018 (Annexure-4) issued by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs affording opportunity of hearing to the petitioner as well as for consequential reliefs.
Mr.Mohanty, learned counsel for the petitioner-Company submits that the petitioner- Company is a manufacturer of fertilizer registered under the provisions of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (for short, ‘the Act’) bearing registration No.21AABCP3276D1ZW. Fo
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Orissa High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.