M/S.Paradeep Phosphates LTD. vs. Asst.Commissioner, CGST And Central Excise, Cuttack

WP(C)/10703/2020HC OrissaGSTCNR ODHC01022806202003 September 2020Bench: MR. JUSTICE K.R.MOHAPATRA,MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ(CJ)5 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

Held

The Court held that an efficacious statutory remedy under Section 107 of the Act was available to the petitioner. Therefore, the writ petition was not maintainable at this stage, and the grounds raised could be considered by the Appellate Authority.

Facts

The petitioner sought a direction to set aside an order rejecting their refund of unutilized Input Tax Credit (ITC) accumulated due to an inverted duty structure. The petitioner argued that the rejection order was cryptic, non-speaking, and passed without an opportunity for hearing, relying on a relevant circular.

Key Issues

Whether a writ petition is maintainable when an alternative statutory remedy is available. Whether the impugned order rejecting the refund claim was legally valid.

Sections Cited

Section 107

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

02 03.09.2020

Heard Mr.Jnanesh Mohanty, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.R.S.Chimanka, learned Senior Standing Counsel for CGST & Central Excise through Video Conferencing mode.

2.

The petitioner-Company in this writ petition prays for a direction to set aside the order passed by the Assistant Commissioner, CGST and Central Excise, Cuttack Division (OP No.1) in rejecting the refund of unutilized ITC to the petitioner-Company accumulated taking into account of inverted duty structure. The petitioner-Company further prays for a direction to the opposite party No.1 to pass a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law taking into consideration the Circular No.59/33/2018-GST dated 04.09.2018 (Annexure-4) issued by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs affording opportunity of hearing to the petitioner as well as for consequential reliefs.

3.

Mr.Mohanty, learned counsel for the petitioner-Company submits that the petitioner- Company is a manufacturer of fertilizer registered under the provisions of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (for short, ‘the Act’) bearing registration No.21AABCP3276D1ZW. Fo

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Orissa High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.