Pramod Kumar Sahoo vs. State Of Odisha

BLAPL/4125/2020HC OrissaGSTCNR ODHC01032688202023 December 2020Bench: DR. JUSTICE S.K. PANIGRAHI13 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

Held

The Court directed the release of the petitioner on bail, considering the charge sheet has been filed, the investigation is complete, and the nature of the offence is compoundable. It emphasized that prolonged custody might not serve the ends of justice, especially when the trial may take time.

Facts

The petitioner, proprietor of M/s. Sahoo Traders, was arrested for allegedly availing and utilizing bogus Input Tax Credit (ITC) of Rs. 2.48 crores on fake invoices and passing on bogus ITC of Rs. 2.48 crores. Further allegations suggest involvement in creating and operating fictitious firms to avail/utilize bogus ITC of Rs. 34.23 crores.

Key Issues

The primary issue was whether the petitioner should be granted bail given the serious allegations of GST fraud and the stage of the proceedings. The court also considered the principles of bail in economic offences and the potential for prolonged pre-trial detention.

Sections Cited

Section 132(1)(i), Section 132(ii), Section 132(1)(iii)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

HIGH COURT OF ORISSA: CUTTACK

BLAPL No.4125 OF 2020

(In the matter of an application under Section 439, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973)

Pramod Kumar Sahoo

… Petitioner

Versus

State of Odisha

… Opposite Party

For petitioner : Shri Ravi Shankar Samal

S. Mishra, S.N. Kanungo,

S.P.Jena, & R. Mohanty

(Advocates)

For the Opp. Party: Shri Sunil Kumar Mishra,

Additional Standing Counsel

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE S.K. PANIGRAHI

Date of Hearing: 16.10.2020 Date of judgment: 23.12.2020

1.

The present petition arises out of a written arrest memo bearing No. 104/CT & GST issued by the Enforcement Unit Bhubaneswar dated 13.03.2020 U/s. 132(I)(b)(c)(i) of OGST Act 2017 whereunder the Petitioner has been arrested on 12.03.2020 and has since been in custody.

2.

The brief facts of the case as alleged by the informant the CT & GST Enforcement unit, Bhubaneswar by the Deputy Commissioner of Sales Tax, CT& GST Enforcement Unit, BBSR, AFR

2

is that the petitioner is the proprietor of M/s.

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Orissa High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.