Surya Narayan Sahu vs. State Of Odisha

WP(C)/12539/2021HC OrissaGSTCNR ODHC01024645202106 April 2021Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY1 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

Facts

The petitioner, Surya Narayan Shu, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Orissa at Cuttack. The Opposite Parties included the State of Odisha and others, represented by the Additional Government Advocate and counsel for CT & GST. The specific tax period, the order or action under challenge, the authority that passed it, and the amount in dispute are not recorded in the judgment. The procedural history leading to the filing of the writ petition is also not detailed.

Held

The Court granted the petitioner's request to withdraw the writ petition. The Court held that the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty granted to the petitioner to file a fresh petition in accordance with law. No specific reasoning was provided for this decision beyond acceding to the petitioner's request. The ratio decidendi is that a petitioner can withdraw a writ petition with liberty to refile if the Court permits it. The operative direction is the dismissal of the writ petition as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition.

Key Issues

1. Whether the petitioner should be granted leave to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh petition in accordance with law? The petitioner sought to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh petition. The revenue or State did not record any specific argument against this request.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.12539 of 2021 Surya Narayan Shu …. Petitioner Mr. D. Panda, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha and others …. Opposite Parties Mr. P.K. Muduli, A.G.A. for State-Opposite Parties Mr. S.S. Padhy, Advocate for CT & GST CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY

ORDER 06.04.2021 Order No.

02.

1. This matter is taken up by video conferencing mode.

2.

Counsel for the Petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh petition in accordance with law.

3.

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as prayed for.

4.

As the restrictions due to the COVID-19 situation are continuing, learned counsel for the parties may utilize a soft copy of this order available in the High Court’s website or print out thereof at par with certified copy in the manner prescribed, vide Court’s Notice No.4587, dated 25th March, 2020. (Dr. S. Muralidhar)

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Orissa High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.