Pyarimohan Pradhan vs. State Of Odisha

WP(C)/35979/2020HC OrissaGSTCNR ODHC01076559202007 June 2021Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY1 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

Facts

The petitioner, Pyarimohan Pradhan, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Orissa at Cuttack. The petition was connected to and had common issues with another writ petition, W.P.(C) No.14924 of 2020. The High Court, in its order dated 7th June 2021, disposed of the present writ petition (W.P.(C) No.35979 of 2020) in terms of the judgment rendered in W.P.(C) No.14924 of 2020 on the same date. Due to ongoing COVID-19 restrictions, parties were permitted to use printouts of the order from the High Court's website as equivalent to certified copies, subject to attestation by the advocate.

Held

The High Court of Orissa at Cuttack disposed of W.P.(C) No.35979 of 2020 in terms of its judgment dated 7th June 2021, which was rendered in W.P.(C) No.14924 of 2020. This implies that the findings, reasoning, and operative directions in the judgment for W.P.(C) No.14924 of 2020 are applicable to the present case. The specific legal principles or ratio decidendi that would be cited from this judgment are not elaborated here, as the order refers to a separate, prior judgment for the substantive decision. No specific amount in dispute or procedural history beyond the filing of the writ petition is recorded. The operative direction was to dispose of the petition in terms of the connected judgment.

Key Issues

The judgment does not explicitly state the specific issues or the arguments presented by the petitioner or the State in W.P.(C) No.35979 of 2020. It only records that the issues in this petition were connected and common to W.P.(C) No.14924 of 2020. Therefore, the specific questions of law or fact that the Court had to decide, and the contentions of each side, are not detailed in this particular order. The order directs that the present petition be disposed of in terms of the judgment in the connected matter, implying that the substantive legal analysis and findings were contained in that other judgment.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.35979 of 2020 Pyarimohan Pradhan …. Petitioner Mr.P.C.Nayak, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha and others …. Opp. Parties Mr.P.K.Muduli, AGA Mr.Sunil Mishra, ASC, CT & GST CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY

ORDER Order No. 7th June, 2021 4. Since the issues here are connected and common to W.P.(C) No.14924 of 2020, the writ petition is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 7th June, 2021 rendered in W.P.(C) No.14924 of 2020. As the restrictions due to resurgence of COVID-19 situation are continuing, learned counsel for the parties may utilize a printout of the order available in the High Court’s website, at par with certified copy, subject to attestation by the concerned advocate, in the manner prescribed vide Court’s Notice No.4587, dated 25th March, 2020 as modified by Court’s Notice No.4798, dated 15th April, 2021. (B.P.Routray)

Judge

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Orissa High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.