Ashok Kumar Saboo vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha

WP(C)/17919/2021HC OrissaGSTCNR ODHC01037631202113 July 2021Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),DR. JUSTICE S.K. PANIGRAHI2 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

Facts

The petitioner, Ashok Kumar Saboo, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Orissa challenging a show-cause notice (SCN) issued to him. The SCN was issued by the revenue authorities, identified as Commissioner and CT & GST, Odisha & Others. The specific tax period and the amount in dispute were not recorded in the judgment. The procedural history indicates that the petitioner approached the High Court directly by way of a writ petition to challenge the SCN before responding to it.

Held

The High Court held that it was not inclined to interfere with the show-cause notice at this stage. The Court reasoned that it is open to the petitioner to raise all available defenses in accordance with law in response to the show-cause notice. This implies that the proper course of action for the petitioner is to respond to the SCN and present their case before the adjudicating authority. The Court did not decide on the merits of the SCN itself, as it was not inclined to delve into those aspects at the writ stage. The ratio decidendi is that writ petitions challenging show-cause notices are generally not entertained by High Courts when the assessee has an alternative remedy to respond to the notice and raise all objections before the concerned authority.

Key Issues

1. Whether the High Court should entertain a writ petition challenging a show-cause notice at this stage, thereby interfering with the ongoing adjudication process under the GST law? (Question of law). Petitioner's contention: The petitioner sought to challenge the SCN directly before the High Court. The judgment does not record specific arguments made by the petitioner regarding the grounds for challenging the SCN or any legal provisions relied upon. Revenue's contention: The revenue authorities, represented by Mr. Sunil Mishra, Additional Standing Counsel (For CT & GST), contended that the High Court should not interfere with the show-cause notice at this preliminary stage. The judgment does not record specific legal provisions or precedents relied upon by the revenue.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
Page 1 of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.17919 of 2021 Ashok Kumar Saboo …. Petitioner Mr. S.K.Acharya, Advocate -versus- Commissioner and CT & GST, Odisha & Others …. Opposite Parties Mr. Sunil Mishra, Additional Standing Counsel (For CT & GST) CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE S.K. PANIGRAHI Order No.

ORDER 13.07.2021

02.

1. This matter is taken up by video conferencing mode.

2.

The challenge in the present writ petition is to a show-cause notice (SCN). At this stage, the Court is not inclined to interfere with it. It is open to the Petitioner to raise all defences available to him in accordance with law in response to the SCN.

3.

The writ petition is accordingly dismissed in the above terms.

4.

As the restrictions due to resurgence of COVID-19 situation are continuing, learned counsel for the parties may utilize a printout of the order available in the High Court’s website, at par with certified copy, subject to attestation by the concerned

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Orissa High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.