Dhaneswar Sahoo vs. Union Of INDIA

WP(C)/7896/2021HC OrissaGSTCNR ODHC01015502202115 July 2021Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),DR. JUSTICE S.K. PANIGRAHI2 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

Facts

The petitioner, Dhaneswar Sahoo, filed a writ petition before the Orissa High Court challenging an order/notice dated January 20, 2020, issued by an unspecified authority. The Opposite Parties were the Union of India and others, represented by the Additional Standing Counsel for C.T. & GST. The specific tax period and the amount in dispute were not recorded in the judgment. The procedural history leading to the writ petition was not detailed, other than the issuance of the impugned order/notice.

Held

The Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition. The Court granted the petitioner liberty to challenge the order/notice dated January 20, 2020, before the appropriate forum in accordance with the law. The Court further directed that if an appeal were filed by August 9, 2021, along with an application for condonation of delay, it should be considered by the competent forum and disposed of in accordance with law. The Court explicitly stated that the petition was disposed of as withdrawn. No specific legal provisions were discussed or interpreted, and no substantive findings on GST law were made.

Key Issues

The Court did not have to decide any substantive legal issues. The primary question was whether the petitioner should be allowed to withdraw the writ petition. The petitioner's counsel sought to withdraw the petition with liberty to challenge the order/notice dated January 20, 2020, before the appropriate forum as per statutory provisions. The revenue or State did not record any specific arguments in opposition to the withdrawal.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
Page 1 of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.7896 of 2021 Dhaneswar Sahoo …. Petitioner Mr.Santosh Kumar Mahanty, Advocate -versus- Union of India and others …. Opposite Parties Mr. S.K. Mishra, Additional Standing Counsel (For C.T.& GST) CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE S.K. PANIGRAHI Order No.

ORDER 15.07.2021

02.

1. This matter is taken up by video conferencing mode.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the petition with liberty to challenge the order/notice dated 20th January, 2020 (Annexure-3) before the appropriate forum in accordance with law as provided in the statutory provision.

3.

If such an appeal is filed not later than 9th August, 2021 accompanied with an application for condonation of delay, it should be considered by competent forum and disposed of in accordance with law.

4.

A petition is disposed of as withdrawn.

5.

As the restrictions due to resurgence of COVID-19 situation are continuing, learned counsel for the parties may utilize a

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Orissa High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.