Devi Dal And Flour vs. State

WP(C)/3853/2003HC OrissaGSTCNR ODHC01002119200308 September 2021Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY1 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

Facts

The petitioner, M/s. Devi Dal and Flour Industries, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Orissa at Cuttack. The opposite parties were the State of Odisha and others. The specific tax period and the order or action under challenge, as well as the authority that passed it, are not detailed in the provided judgment. The amount in dispute is also not mentioned. The procedural history relevant to the core dispute is not elaborated upon.

Held

The Court allowed the petitioner's request to withdraw the writ petition. The Court granted liberty to the petitioner to file a revision petition not later than November 1, 2021. If such a revision is filed along with an application for condonation of delay, the authority considering the revision will take into account the petitioner's explanation for the delay, attributing it to the pendency of the present writ petition. The Court explicitly stated that it had not expressed any view on the question of limitation or on the merits of the case. No specific legal principles were established or applied, and no substantive issues were decided.

Key Issues

The Court was not required to decide any substantive legal issues. The primary question before the Court was whether to grant the petitioner's request to withdraw the writ petition. The petitioner argued for withdrawal with liberty to file a revision petition. The State's arguments are not recorded in the judgment. No specific provisions of the GST Act or Rules were debated, nor were any precedents cited in the context of a substantive legal challenge.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.3853 of 2003 M/s. Devi Dal and Flour Industries …. Petitioner Mr. B. Mohanti, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha and others …. Opp. Parties Mr. R.S. Chimanka, Sr. SC, CT & GST CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE B.P. ROUTRAY Order No.

ORDER

08.09.

2021

07.

1. Learned counsel for the Petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file a revision petition in accordance with law. If such a revision is filed not later than 1st November, 2021 along with an application for condonation of delay, then any explanation offered by the Petitioner for the delay in filing such revision on account of the pendency of the present petition, will be taken into account by the authority in accordance with law. This Court clarifies that it has not expressed any view either on the question of limitation or on merits.

2.

The writ petition is disposed of in the above terms.

(Dr. S. Muralidhar)

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Orissa High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.