M/S.Hamid Garments vs. Dy.Commnr.Of Commer
Facts
The petitioner, M/s. Hamid Garments, filed a writ petition (W.P.(C) No.460 of 2015) before the High Court of Orissa at Cuttack. The respondent was the Deputy Commissioner of Sales Taxes, Cuttack-II Circle, Cuttack. The petitioner sought leave to withdraw the writ petition. The Court was asked to consider the procedural history and the potential delay in filing an appeal.
Held
The Court allowed the petitioner's request to withdraw the writ petition. The Court granted the petitioner liberty to file an appeal before the appellate authority. The Court directed that if an appeal, accompanied by an application for condonation of delay, is filed by the petitioner not later than November 1, 2021, the appellate authority shall take into account any explanation offered by the petitioner for the delay on account of the pendency of the writ petition. The Court explicitly stated that it had not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case or on the question of delay. Annexure-4 was to be returned to the petitioner upon substitution by a photocopy.
Key Issues
The primary issue before the Court was whether to grant the petitioner's request to withdraw the writ petition. The petitioner sought liberty to file an appeal before the appellate authority. The Court also needed to consider how any delay in filing the appeal, potentially caused by the pendency of the writ petition, should be treated by the appellate authority. The Court was not to express any opinion on the merits of the case or the question of delay. The petitioner argued for withdrawal with liberty to appeal. The revenue's arguments are not recorded.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
ORDER 08.09.2021 Order No.
1. Learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file appeal before the appellate authority.
The writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
If any appeal accompanied by an application for condonation of delay is filed by the Petitioner not later than 1st November 2021, any explanation offered by the Petitioner for the delay in filing the appeal on account of the pendency of the present petition, will be taken into account by the appellate authority in accordance with law.
It is made clear that this Court has not expressed a
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Orissa High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.