M/S Mrtc (INDIA) PVT. LTD. vs. The Principal Commnr. GST And Cx, Bbsr I

WP(C)/24942/2021HC OrissaGSTCNR ODHC01053774202116 September 2021Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY1 pages
AI SummaryPartly Allowed

Held

The Court held that the order dated September 16, 2021, passed by the High Court, should be implemented. However, this implementation is explicitly made subject to the final outcome of C.A. No. 010763 of 2017, which is pending before the Supreme Court of India. The reasoning appears to be an acknowledgment of the pending higher judicial review and a pragmatic approach to allow interim measures while respecting the ultimate authority of the Supreme Court. The operative direction is to implement the previous order conditionally. No specific issues were expressly left undecided, as the Court proceeded to dispose of the application.

Facts

The petitioner, M/s. MRTC (INDIA) Pvt., Ltd., approached the High Court of Orissa at Cuttack. The case involves an application (I.A. No. 2553 of 2022) related to an earlier order dated September 16, 2021, passed by the same Court. The Opposite Parties are the Principal Commissioner, GST & CX, and another authority. The Senior Standing Counsel for the Opposite Party stated no objection to the prayer being granted. The Court was informed that the implementation of its order dated September 16, 2021, is subject to the outcome of C.A. No. 010763 of 2017 pending before the Supreme Court of India. The present application was disposed of based on this understanding.

Key Issues

The primary issue before the Court was the implementation of its previous order dated September 16, 2021, in light of a pending appeal before the Supreme Court. The Court had to decide whether to grant the prayer for implementation, subject to the outcome of the Supreme Court case. The petitioner sought the implementation of the Court's earlier order. The revenue, through its Senior Standing Counsel, indicated no objection to the prayer being granted, thereby implicitly agreeing to the implementation being conditional on the Supreme Court's decision.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C). No.24942 of 2021 M/s. MRTC (INDIA) Pvt., Ltd. …. Petitioner Miss Kananbala Roy Choudhury, Advocate -versus- The Principal Commissioner, GST & CX and another …. Opposite Parties Mr. R.S. Chimanka, Senior Standing Counsel CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY Order No.

ORDER 11.03.2022

I.A. No. 2553 of 2022 02. 1. Mr. R.S. Chimanka, learned Senior Standing Counsel for the Opposite Party states that he has no objection if the prayer is granted.

2.

Accordingly, it is directed that the order dated 16th September 2021, passed by this Court, may be implemented subject to the outcome of C.A. No.010763 of 2017 pending before the Supreme Court of India.

3.

Accordingly, the present application is disposed of.

(Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice

(B. P. Routray)

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Orissa High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.